this movie does not deserve the one awful star given,

Rating: 1/10 (27 November 2008)

but it seems not possible to give a 0 (zero).
So cliché, such bad a plot; Hollywood at it's worst. I strongly agree with all negative comments written and I just had to add one myself. So, people, beware the deceptive rating this movie has! It's very likely all the 10 out of 10 stars are from people trying to fool others into watching just to avenge the sorrow for their own loss of time with this piece of cinematographic crap. Or having the IQ of S.Palin fans. This movie just triggers my rant reflex.
And Besson. What happened to this guy? Hard to believe it is the same person who gave us "Leon" and "Nikita".
Not to speak of Neeson. Did he need the money so bad? Was he on drugs when he signed up for this act?
So, people of good taste, don't waste your time on this one.
P.S. I just got a comment from a friend, which will not change the rating of the movie, but could shed a light, however skewed, on the motivation of a french guy to do this movie: portray mainstream Hollywood as seen/perceived from an European perspective, but do it in a way to fool mainstream US audiences and get away with the money ... very subtle ... and so much so that it works! look at the ratings! :)