An epic Nutshell of flaws!

Rating: 6/10 (27 December 2017)

Though, it can't be deemed one of the worst science fiction, fantasy movies, it is certainly not the best Star Wars movie. The third entry in George Lucas' epic prequel trilogy may offer plenty of iconic and enjoyable moments, but there is also a lot of flaws that overwhelm the movie completely.
Unlike the fine pacing of the previous two movies, Revenge of the Sith is very slow and, though there is plenty of action scenes and light-sabre duels, it doesn't live up to the other instalments, nor does it live up to the continuity of the classic original trilogy.
The screenplay by George Lucas is not great and the love triangle between Anakin and Padme is just as boring and lame as ever. The overuse of silly dialogue is just tiring and the slow character development is nothing essential compared to the memorable characters of the original trilogy. The performance of Ian McDiarmid as the villainous Chancellor Palpatine/Emperor is excellent and noteworthy, and, arguably, the most iconic performance of Prequels. Other creditable performers I would add Ewan McGregor as Obi-Wan Kenobi, as well as Frank Oz as Master Yoda. On the weaker side: Hayden Christensen and Natalie Portman. Though, I believe most of the flaws of the movie is due to the poor screenplay.
It is worth noting Revenge of the Sith is the ultimatum Star Wars movie of action sequences. Features the closing chapter of the Clone Wars, General Grievous, a brief appearance of Count Dooku, the advancement of dark side and the fall of the Jedi. This all sums up to making Revenge of the Sith the most explosive, action-packed Star Wars movie yet.