Acting horrible, dialogue atrocious

Rating: 1/10 (19 May 2005)

I keep hoping that new three movies will be half way as decent as the originals. Well, the first three are done and boy am I glad that I won't subject myself to having to wait around to be disappointed again. I believed the reviews that said this one was good. What I want to know is, who are these people that thought this was a good movie (and gave it a 10)? Were they watching the same movie as me? Did they tune out the dialogue and not watch the wooden actors? If that's the case, then maybe I can understand their belief that it was good.
I went to the midnight show last night, stayed in line, I'm a fan. But, the original three can stand up to multiple viewings. Personally, I don't think these three can really stand up to a first viewing (I still haven't been able to finish watching Attack of the Clones). I was cringing at how bad the dialogue was and how badly acted this film was. Now, I normally enjoy most of these actors. Natalie Portman as Marty in Beautiful Girls is one of my favourite movies. Jimmy Smits, I totally loved him on TV. Who did I think was the best actor in this movie? Yoda and he was CGI (with of course, a lot of help from Frank Oz).
The effects? Quite beautiful, but did they all have to go in every scene. It was almost impossible to follow what was happening since everything was going on all at once. It would have been nice in the flight battles to be able to actually pick out the Jedi ships.
I have never given a bad review of a movie before. I normally can find some thing nice to say, but I just couldn't keep this to myself. This movie was not well done.