Moderately more tolerable than the other two. Awful otherwise.

Rating: 1/10 (20 May 2005)

Since so many users seem to have their heads elsewhere during the watching of this movie I thought I'd provide my own thoughts on this piece of mediocre garbage that's thankfully less rotten than it's predecessors.
The following quote from actormanUS which I feel sufficiently highlights my points about what was weak about this movie. Thank you to actorman_US (http://www.imdb.com/user/ ur2106076/comments) for graciously hitting all my main points and saving me the time of writing it myself. Please read it with a suitable amount of sarcasm:
"Gone is the overly wooden acting and the ridiculously petrified dialog. In there place is a logical and believable storyline. Anakin's transformation is inexorably sensible. It is natural and not forced into shape by wooden dialog. Scenes between Anakin and Padme, are heartfelt and honest- a far cry from their nearly unwatchable scenes in ATTACK OF THE CLONES."
That's pretty much it. A honest review from someone who made it through this awful movie, wont stop you from seeing it. But don't buy the desperate fans trying to convince themselves the end of the Star Wars legacy is anything but mediocre, at best. And a far cry from the original trilogy.