Episodes III and V were the only good ones

Rating: 8/10 (17 August 2005)

Does anyone else out there think that episode iii (revenge of the sith) and episode v (empire strikes back) were the only good ones in the whole star wars saga???
i mean, episode iv was bad even on 1970s film standards - the script was just dull, it went on for ages about not a lot - i admit the ending was pretty OK but then, when you think about it, everything they accomplish at the end of iv is irrelevant, cos the baddies just rebuild the damn thing!!!
episode vi just takes AGES to get anywhere, all that mundane blah blah blah at the beginning about saving han takes way too long.
don't even get me started with the AWFUL accent of mcgregor in episode i, and the diabolical acting/script of episode ii.
why do people rave about these movies??? apart from iii and v, they were poorly acted, poorly scripted and poorly shot. OK, so they did something no one had ever done before, but they did it badly!!!!!!!!!!!!!!