Did we all see the same original trilogy?

Rating: Null/10 (15 May 2002)

Been seeing some funny things in this review column, comparing the new films to the original trilogy. I love the criticisms... wooden acting, shallow plot lines, bad love scenes...
Let's look at the originals shall we? Two words, Mark Hamill. How typical american is that kid? How godawful is his acting - even after 3 movies playing the same character? He has two facial expressions, confused and sooky. The love scenes in the first three movies? A kiss on the cheek for good luck, an incestuous snog... come on! Admittedly, the Han/Leia chemistry works a LITTLE better (and why wouldn't it...) but let's not get ahead of ourselves. The original trilogy were cheesy, lame and poor - but they were CLASSIC! I will never tire of them.
The thing I like best about both Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones is the addition of the political elements, as well as the genre jumping. Sure, they are lightweight and full of holes, but this is entertainment. If I wanted reality, I would ogle breasts on Temptation Island Uncut cause that is REALLY real *snigger*. (Speaking of, how's the multiple excuses to show off Natalie Portman's midriff in Attack of the Clones! Mmmmm).
Go see it. Don't analyse it, just enjoy it. Its cheesy, the acting is not always great - but its a piece of art. You don't always get great plotlines out of a holiday - but you can often get breathtaking scenery and enough fun times to take with you. Step out of this world for 2 hours and see the latest Star Wars installment. I cannot wait for 2005. 8.5/10