'This' made your top 250???!!!

Rating: 3/10 (5 September 1999)

The fact that 30% of voters registered this film 10/10 worries me. As a completely unimpressed party, I would really like to know why?
It wasn't terrible but it also wasn't very good.
It's acting; storyline and dialogue left me restless in my seat after a mere half-hour. Those that raved about this film must have such blind faith in the past three films, that they would have enjoyed a film of Luke Skywalker finishing a crossword puzzle.
Am I being overly harsh about this film as an adverse reaction to the religious following it is receiving? Maybe - but there aren't many unbiased opinions around.
There were a few small redeeming qualities: The special effects were good; some of the shots were very interesting and Liam Neeson was streets above his co-actors.
All in all the only real interest in the film are the connotations to the preceding movies. which I suppose is what it's all about.
Take away the Star Wars from this film and it goes straight to video.