A critique

Rating: 5/10 (5 July 2002)

First of all I would like know what constitutes an 'episode'? Seeing as there were only six in a gargantuan conflict which presumably lasted years, you'd think an 'episode' would be a pretty large turning point? In the original they were: destruction of he death star, Luke is vader' son, and the destruction of another Death Star ( They might have given the most important weapon in the universe a better defence second time around ), however Episode I (and II) hardly anything consequential happens.

I have trouble believing that he would begin writing something as exciting sounding as 'Star Wars' with a story involving tax regulations. Surely, given 15 odd years to spare, a better story could have been written, maybe starting when Anakin wasn't a kid. Why do we have to see in the prequels, Anakin wrestling with his soul to prove to us he's evil? Can't we just accept that in action / adventure films bad guys get evil behind the scenes , which saves us a lot of emotional hassle?
Special effects are also a problem in Episode I and II. A reliance on CG effects has made films date even before they have been released. The purpose of special effects is , forgive me if I'm wrong, to make a scene or stunt look real. The models in the originals looked real, unlike the aliens such as jar jar which, I fear will look like brer rabbit in 'Song of the South' in a few years time. But, the various worlds lucas creates are often stunning, The City Planet, probably lifted from Asimov's Foundation series, looks great, as does the naboo planet.
But Critisism of this film, and there has been mountains of it, is useless seeing as the movie made a billion dollars worldwide, But it was obvious that 1999 was a one off and Episode II was to receive little hype and money ( comparitivly) to Episode I.