The weakest of the series, but still quite well done.

Rating: 7/10 (19 May 1999)

The Phantom Menace is the weakest of the four Star Wars films, but how could it live up to the hype? It is not anywhere close to the disappointment other films like Jurassic Park and Godzilla were, but it has its share of problems. Lucas' script is predictable and his dialogue at times is p*** poor. I have been told that he spent years on the script; other writers have done better with less time. The script is a bit closer to The Matrix than the brilliant Fifth Element a couple years ago. The most annoying thing is the character of Jar Jar Binks. He is Lucas' attempt at comic relief, but everytime he spoke I cringed. I cringed twice as hard when he did something allegedly funny or cute. However, I must credit Lucas' direction. The visuals are the most outstanding ever. He keeps the style of the original films, but improves the effects considerably. This films should be up for sound, sound effects editing, art direction, visual effects, and makeup around Oscar time. As far as best picture, it does not stand a chance. The acting is alright, with one standout in the ensemble. This film may be Natalie Portman's big break. She has delivered stong performances over the years in The Professional, Heat, and Beautiful Girls. In Portman's hands Queen Amidala outshines, McGregor's Obi-Wan and Neeson's Qui-Gon Jinn. She also outshines all the colorful creatures. This girl has a future, I hope her performance will be taken seriously. The Phantom Menace is not perfection. I did not expect perfection, but it is quite well done thanks to George Lucas' direction, visual effects, and Natalie Portman's amazingly strong performance.
3.5 stars out of 4