Good but not great

Rating: 6/10 (22 May 2013)

I am Star Trek fan though I would hardly call myself a Trekkie(Trekker?). Regardless, I have a good understanding of the Trek universe, it's principle characters, narratives and locales. This entire film is a giant wink, gun and nod to the entire franchise of Star Trek. It's to the point where the writers have decided that they want the characters in the film to be self aware as actors in a decade long show and movie franchise. There are constant references to Star Trek movies and shows of years past which is a neat touch to those that want to see a film solely based on obscure references. Well, I am NOT one of those people. I want a movie with a plot that makes me care. Better yet, I would settle with one that makes sense. I would like to see villains that are motivated by their own struggles. Their drive should be based in obscurity. The audience should almost agree with their cause but ultimately see that the good guys have a better plan that doesn't involve the end justifying the means. Star Trek Into Darkness has none of that. Those who are evil are too evil. Those who are good are way too good. Star Trek has never been about good vs evil.
On the other hand, the acting was great special effects were fantastic and the humor kept the film fresh. The pacing was also quite good though I was surprised it ended abruptly. Mind you, one can expect this in the second installment of what is obviously going to be a trilogy.
6/10 for lame story, lame bad guys, constant easter eggs, good acting, great special effects, humor.