Disappointing

Rating: 2/10 (22 October 2013)

In the first 10 minutes, this continuation of the Star Trek saga (compared to all media, even fan fiction) breaks all the Star Trek rules. The actors are great (as they were in the last one) but the script is garbage if considered within the canon of ST. Are all of the writers of the last decade deliberately making Kirk a fool and Spock emotional? That's already been done ... to death. Didn't anyone follow the "canon" up to this point? Is this because of their opinions of William Shatner (if so, agreed, for that period of his career. He's better now as can be seen in several television series.)? The previous Star Trek (2009) was "worthy" within the canon of the universe of ST. This film is weak because of the very poor writing. ... but it's always the writing, isn't it? I accept it a bit as an amusing SF film. As a part of the Star Trek canon... never.