The Reboots are far superior to the original movies and shows.

Rating: 10/10 (16 June 2013)

I've watched Star trek shows and movies since they first came on TV, but I don't see myself as a "Trekkie", as their on line comments suggest a lack of understanding of what good Science Fiction is and should be; they sound far too immature for this gentry.
Anyway, the original shows (except for the disaster called "Enterprise")were good, especially my favorite, Deep Space Nine. I never had a high opinion of Roddenberry, who seemed to have gotten his original idea from the 50s movie, "Forbidden Planet", but never acknowledged this. It wasn't until he was gone before the show was free to reach it's potential and go outside the box with DS9. Why? Those characters were edgy, earthy, as real people with real emotions and behaviors were.
For that same reason, the new reboot is far and away superior to all that's gone before. The characters are far more human, interesting and edgy. "Into Darkness" takes the old "Wrath of Khan" idea, possibly the worse Sci Fi movie ever made and makes it a true Sci Fi/Star Trek classic. This is Star Trek at it's very finest. Well done, Mr. Abrams.