A solid 7

Rating: 7/10 (19 May 2013)

What this story- which had two excellent and unforeseen plot twists- is missing is significance. There is no depth, no deeper implication. In the end it is pointless which is a shame because Gene Rodenberry strove to speak to higher issues. It's the McRib of Star Trek films.
I prefer the Bond franchise where attempts to introduce clever technology and emotional attachment to the characters in the Daniel Craig reboot (specifically in Casino Royale and Skyfall) has resulted in a far higher quality product. And that's what Star Trek: Into Darkness is... it is product. It feels like the Frankenberry cereal to just about ever other franchise sequels wholesome, a** kicking bowl of Vector.
See it but don't come running to me when you get " the diabetus"- I warned you it was junk food.