IMDb Reviewers... REALLY???

Rating: 3/10 (28 May 2013)

So, after watching this movie, I can say it is a rehash of the original wrath of khan. Sure, it appeared they were going to end the movie with kirk dying, then being brought back to life and the screenwriters decided that those of us who saw the original were going to be incensed so they decided to add on a 1/2 hour "second" ending...
Hollywood had evolved to this now. We are to the point were there is very little original ideas anymore. What else is coming up this summer? The man of steel (how many other superman movies have been done), the lone ranger (yeah, I still have the 33RPM LPs from my childhood).
The problem isn't with Hollywood, it is with US! Don't buy tickets for this nonsense! Better yet, don't rate this rubbish so high! Who is giving this a 9 or 10 overall?! Lets put this in perspective, as of 28 May 2013, this movie has a 8.3 overall rating. The Wizard of Oz has a 8.2. Now, the Wizard of Oz is one of AFIs top 10 movies OF ALL TIME. Lawrence of Arabia is a 8.4, so it is only .1 above this nonsense... CITIZEN KANE is only 8.5 according to IMDb, which is only .2 above this drivel.
What is going on out there? There is no way someone can see Citizen Kane, and see this movie and honestly give them the SAME rating. Come on folks. Roger Ebert is rolling over in his grave.