Empty, felt like a parody on Star Trek

Rating: 1/10 (29 May 2013)

The days when Star Trek was about bold Sci-Fi ideas and originality are officially over.
Con's 1. The story is empty and boring. As if someone from the real-life Idiocracy world wrote and directed the whole movie.
2. Great cast, BUT for some reason surprisingly bad acting!! Chris Pine (Kirk) was overplaying, Zachary Quinto (Spock) was OK (but, hey, anyone can play poker-faced Spock, as long as the person's face features more or less match the old Spock's face), Karl Urban (Bones) was annoying, Simon Pegg (Scotty) was unconvincing and too artificial, others - almost invisible and totally unimpressive. Benedict Cumberbatch (Khan) was an interesting addition, though, after becoming recently famous in Sherlock (TV series).
3. It felt like everyone was TRYING HARD to make a parody on the old Star Trek series.
4. Movie almost randomly filled with special effects. It's like eating ANYTHING, including your shoe, when you are hungry, just to fill your stomach. That's how they tried to bury the empty story into special effects.
Pro's
1. Great special effects.