Cool, eventful, envisioned and re-established movie

Rating: 10/10 (21 November 2009)

I've never been an avid follower of Star Trek nor Star Wars series. But I always remember when I was young how I got fascinated watching the older version of these movies in a defunct VHS format medias. I can't even remember the older version of the only Star Trek movie I've ever watched, but admittedly it was one of the best classic sci-fi films I've ever witnessed. I can tell that Star Trek has to have more lead compared to Star Wars. The latter considerably to be an entertaining film as well but Star Trek has the sharper phase and delightfully different attitude in its story. Forget to mention I didn't quite like much the remake of Star Wars, as how they were visualized and dramatized. I can clearly see the pale dramatization of characters in Star Wars than in Star Trek. This is the only variance I could see between the two. Though they undeniably equal in terms of effects, uniqueness of story and plot they have differences. At any rate, this fresh remake of Star Trek movie had got to be one you need to absolutely see. Chris Pine effectively characterized his role as the son of George Kirk (Chris Hemsworth), and Zachary Quinto had me reminisced a lot of his character as one of those Vulcan habitants. The story was also very much solidly established. I'm impressed how they managed to have such considerably effective paperwork of script to visualize this uncanny, heavy-effect sci-fi film. The crew certainly deserves a worth of a recognition and payroll for such job well done. I was enthralled and thrilled with the joyride of this film. The people, the acting crew had made their roles convincingly well and it is a great deal to be acquainted with their effort-full job. Eric Bana did get a grip of that antagonistic aura of a villain, somewhat confused, vengeful, cruel and honored. I consider this film to be a worthwhile choice of seeing over and over again.