Won 2015 best film Oscar for subject-matter, not artistic quality

Rating: 5/10 (5 September 2016)

I rarely watch movies, but someone recommended this one to me as a "balanced" portrayal of the priest abuse crisis. I wasn't impressed, especially after having read traditional Catholic Randy Engel's excellent investigative journalism into the priest-pederast crisis, her 5 vol. «Rite of Sodomy: Homosexuality and the Roman Catholic Church».
The film mentioned how homosexuality has nothing to do with this crisis, which is not at all true (80-90% of the cases are ephebophilia, sodomitic attraction to teenage males, not pedophilia). It portrayed the free press as the real savior of mankind (thus promoting more French Revolution, Liberal errors; cf. Pope Gregory XVI's encyclical «Mirari Vos»). The journalists were portrayed as "secular confessors." I did learn one thing: The Boston Globe got its first Jewish editor, Marty Barton, right before the Spotlight team started running hundreds of stories against the Church. Conflict of interest? Balanced journalism? Where are the stories on pederast rabbis? Pedophile school teachers? etc.? In this sense, the film correctly portrayed Barton as being against "the system" (i.e., against the Catholic Church).
Also, Boston Globe won the Pulitzer Prize in 2003 because of its Spotlight team's work. The Spotlight film won an Academy Award for best film of 2015! Pattern here? Yes: Jew-dominated, self-laudatory awards being used to undermine the Church's authority.
The film's character development and artistic quality was sorely lacking.