I have to disagree...

Rating: 9/10 (6 May 2007)

After seeing spider-man 3, i innocently came on here to find out what else Topher Grace was off. I was shocked to find so many people running the film down.
I loved both of the other spider-man films and this one was no exception. Other comments about it have said its cheesy. Yes, it is cheesy. But so hilarious with it. Whats wrong with peter parker's cheesy dancing?! Walking down the street, thinking he's a pimp? Hes meant to be a bit of an idiot. THATS THE POINT.
Other people have said there's too many rivals for spider-man. I'll agree that there maybe is too many. But the length of the film makes up for it. All the characters had a background, were seen being transformed and had their part in the story. So i do not agree with 'the characters had no depth, no chance to evolve'. Thats bull.
And the film is not on any accounts, a chick flick. The people who have commented this, have said they liked the first ones. If this is a chick flick, then so are they. Yeah, Peter and MJ, Harry and MJ, Peter and MJ but thats half of the story.
I loved the film as much as the first and second. If you've not seen it, i'd say go. It's been proved to not be to everyones taste, but thats a conclusion to make for yourself. If you're still unsure whether to go see it, bear in mind i am going to see it AGAIN and will no doubt buy it on DVD the first day it comes out. Don't listen to the people running it down. After reading A lot of negative reviews on here i've realised that most of the people who wrote them can't even spell. Seriously, have a look! Says it all really...