Very disappointing for a movie worth us$300 million

Rating: 3/10 (13 May 2007)

They could have made another 30 very good movies for this budget. Spiderman 1 is still 100x better than number 3. They should stop with the cash-cow approach in Hollywood, and become more imaginative and creative! The movie is filled with "cheap" special effects, where it's very clear that Spiderman is a 3D animation, rather than a "real" character. Even my 12 year old son thought it was disappointing compared to number one (and two). I had hoped they would raise the bar with this one - meaning the bar that allows you to think you're in the movie, rather than being a spectator. Movies should bring emotions, and the more the better - this movie didn't bring any emotions over, I mean, none! It's time for more Stanley Kubricks, Alfred Hitchcocks and Roberto Benignis, as I think the world has seen enough Spidermans for the next 100 years. At least I have :)