Spider-Man 3 was good, but a bit disappointing

Rating: 8/10 (22 May 2007)

Spiderman 3 was a lot of fun to watch. I was so excited to watch it because of the drama and action which was going to take place. When I watched it, I still left happy. I still talked about it with my girl friend and family. We all loved it. We all agreed that there was a little "too much" put into it to fully love it. Like many people say, it sort of lacked the brilliance of spiderman 2. Spiderman 2 was awesome! Spiderman 3 was good. See the difference? Besides all the "Too much", I was looking for a lot of involvement with Venom. Lets do a little history, Venom is spiderman's worst and deadly enemy because venom has his exact same powers but more deadlier, spiderman can't use his spider senses, and he is a major threat to spiderman. It really lacked those options. It would've been nice if we saw Spiderman and Venom web slinging in the town and fighting each other. That didn't happen, sadly. :( .... The movie could've honestly left out sandman and use more of venom, or vice versa of using sandman throughout the whole movie. (which ever will make u smile) In the movie, we never got to see why venom was such a threat. The only thing we knew was he had powers like spiderman.
Another thing which sadly "sucked" was spiderman kept getting his butt whoopped or "served". In Spiderman 2, Spiderman was an awesome fighter, and we could tell Peter learned new moves and learned more of using his abilities. Spiderman 3 failed to prevail that to us. Spiderman was just web slinging and not much action until his black suit came on. It leads to the question, does spiderman know how to fight? Spiderman is supposed to be a better fighter, and be more smarter and wiser.
We know Spiderman has spider senses right? Well, it wasn't in the movie. There was not a scene where spiderman had a prediction and moved as quickly as possible. It sadden me when I notice this. Spiderman could've been like batman, but he knew how to shoot out a web. This movie was kind of rushed and missed key important figures.
However! Peter Parker does an amazing bad boy act. People criticize it, but I thought it was funny and fun. OK. Peter Parker is a dork right? He is nice right? Well isn't that suppose to be reversed because of the transformation which the outer-space creature does to him? Tobey Maguire did a great job at it. We never expected him to do anything of that nature. Tobey Maguire in general is a mild manner guy, and isn't knownfor a "bad boy" attitude. He made it fun, and showed us a sign of acting. Stop messing him! He did a great job.
The movie picks up very well! It doesn't go into a whole new chapter and has no relativity. Spiderman 3 picks it up very well, but just misses a few figures which doesn't top em all. The action was great and so was the effects. You gotta them credit for the effects. They are as real as they can be; however, it doesn't have a whole new jump start like spiderman 2. I hope if another one is made, the next producer can bring venom back and do some more work. The sandman showed it's purpose. Venom did not. Venom is like dark side with Superman. Dark side is more powerful than Superman, and Superman has to use everything he can to win. Venom didn't serve his same purpose. We saw how spiderman was no match, but we want more. That's it. Spiderman 3 is still a great sequel; sadly, not many movies has a 3rd film to pick up all the rest of the films. It would've been nice to see it, but sadly it couldn't compete. Again, the movie is good or great however you want to say it. Many people criticize because they aren't spiderman fans. Any Spiderman fan would love it. It lacked a few figures