A let down to fans of the Comic everywhere.

Rating: 6/10 (13 May 2007)

now, if i hadn't been even vaguely familiar with Marvel canon, hell, i'd say this was a good enough movie. As far as a Spiderman film goes though, it's also the worst. Not saying its bad, just that the first two were much better. There's and imbalance between focus on Peter and on Spiderman. Sometimes you wonder if its Peter Parker 3, as opposed to Spider-Man 3. But, aside from the drama being haphazardly done, the action sequences are the best yet. The real problem lies with trying to introduce two villains into one film, when one is such a prolific character in the Marvel universe, that he really needs an entire movie. Said villain is Venom. We get a 20 minute period with him, and that's it. At least they made him look good. My main beef with the film was that they were promising us Venom, and we got 20 minutes. And they killed him way to easily. Anyone with half a brain knows that Venom was pretty much Spider-Man's equal if not superior at times. Maybe i'm just too much of a comic geek to not be critical, but, if you're gonna introduce two villains in one movie, make sure the most popular, powerful, eviler one gets more than 20 minutes.