Just because it's the worst of the series, doesn't mean it's a bad film

Rating: 7/10 (21 November 2010)

Episode #2 of Lionheart490's IMDb Movie Reviews
I rarely go into theaters to actually see a movie, and when I do I want the movie to be great, I remember watching X2 while I was at infant age and I will always remember the day I went into theaters to see the end to the Spiderman trilogy, Spiderman 3.
When I saw the movie on the big screen, I though it was a great summer blockbuster, yet if you compared it to Spiderman and Spiderman 2, it is considered the worst. But It isn't a bad film.
So people complained that the movie had too many plots going at once, but I relieved that all of these plots have something in common (excluding Peter-go-emo) they all involve revenge. Peter wants revenge on Sandman for killing Uncle Ben, Harry wanting revenge on Peter for killing his father, and Eddy wanting revenge of Peter for getting him fired, it is all escalates to an amazing finale. Also, the special effects were amazing for the symbiote and the Sandman, they were really realistic, you seriously believed a man was made of sand. Also, J. Jonah Jameson supplies some of the comic relief scenes that made be crack up.
Now, this movie isn't perfect either because I didn't think that Topher Grace make a good Eddie Brock and didn't to me make a good Venom, maybe its just the physical appearance. I also really hated the Spidey-go-emo scene, they could have shown that the symbiote was controlling him in a less stupid way. Also, I hate how Peter and Mary Jane don't get together in the end and don't get married, the whole subplot of marriage was a giant waste. Speaking of Venom, many fans were saying that Venom didn't get enough screen time, but I thought that he had enough to get what he was there for. Overall, this is the worst of the series, but it is an amazing blockbuster. For what it is, I give it a 7/10.