Almost killed the franchise

Rating: Null/10 (19 August 2012)

This movie deserved major editing. First of all, sandman never should've been a villain, nor should he've been the killer of uncle Ben. This latter was a major plot hole that could fit a fat person. As I recall, in the first movie, when uncle Ben lay dying on the street the police said that they knew where the shooter was heading, yet in this one the shooter was in custody by the police. It also threw the canon out the window. The first movie had perfect structure: peter Parker fought crime out of guilt over uncle bens death because he let the robber get away. Now, according to this film, it was okay for him to be vindictive towards the wrestling promoter that screwed him over. Okay. Goodbye spiderman mission statement. Furthermore. The venom story was structured perfectly, but I think that Eddie Brock should've been going on crime sprees(for economic and vindictive reasons) as the doppelgänger of spiderman, and been the one in cahoots with Harry Osborn up until the end, when Osborn has change of heart. Given these changes, the movie could've been a hands down winner.