I personally liked it .

Rating: 10/10 (21 May 2007)

I personally liked it . I'am sick of everyone being total jerks about it. The movie was directed by the same guy that directed the first two , and done in the same style. Yet everyone is writing bad reviews . Yes it wasn't as stupendous as the second but it was still good . Don't mistake the movie for being bad it was done like the others the bad reviews are because so many people waited for it with suspense and because it didn't blow them away their angry . but it actually wasn't bad like the reviews make it sound . I could have done without EM spider man and the pelvic thrust , and the dancing but otherwise it was pretty much like the first and second . the action was great and the cgi too. I admit it did dwell on his personal life a bit but like the second didn't as well. God if you haven't seen it don't listen to the bad reviews their just retarded . It wasn't bad in fact it's my personal favorite.Venom is a big issue as well . If your a fan you know he was infected by the symbiote . His time in movie was small but in order to have a plot you need character development like peter turning evil because of the suit . So in a way he had a small part but thats because of peters development and the time limit of almost 3 hours.I liked it .