not bad but not good either, entertaining at best!

Rating: 7/10 (7 July 2004)

Spiderman an Oscar worthy movie?? haha in what galaxy are the 2 people that wrote that from? people please read this if you want an accurate review OK....this movie was very entertaining and visually good with good special effects and a pretty good story but everything else was average at best!..toby mcguire can act actually but he did not do well in spiderman nor did he need to! all he needed to do was be a nerd when he was not in costume and spin webs when he was in costume, so in that sense he did fine. Kirstin dunce!! woops i mean dunst cannot act at all, she is another drew barymore is all but uglier!..and the acting by the rest of the cast was mediocre, I'm not saying this was a bad film, but it chaps my butt when i see so many people saying how awazing it was , give me a break both superman 1 and 2 were 10 times better then this, superman was the best hero/character movie , and even the hulk movie was better then spiderman...spidy gets a 7 out of 10 for me by all means its worth seeing but its not Oscar worthy nor is it worth 9 dollars, matinée at best.