does this movie hold up to its ratings???? NO.

Rating: 5/10 (11 August 2002)

the other night i thought i was getting the privilege to see the movie "Signs." i went into the theater all psyched up and ready for a non-stop suspense thriller. the first 20 minutes of the movie were ok....but even 20 minutes into it it felt as if the movie was already dragging along at a slow pace. this, right off the bat pissed me off.
*WARNING THIS PARAGRAPH CONTAINS SPOILERS* what really p***es me off about to stupid movie is the lack of depth to things that are going on in the movie. for example...at the end of the movie when the aliens invade all you hear is that the aliens invaded and the humans found a primitive way to stop them, and there gone now. BOOM thats it....NOTHING ELSE....thats a load of crap. and how come the alien doesnt attack jaquin phoenix...i saw some other person say because his only defense was the poison...yea...right buddy...it didnt seem like the aliens only defense was the poison when it went after mel gibson underneath the cracks of the door. that was lame. the only thing that saved this movie from me crapping on it was the acting of jaquin phoenix. He did really well in this film...but even he couldnt save this peice of trash from being a horrible movie...sorry "sign" fans...dont waste money on this pile of garbage..id rather watch Spy Kids 2.