Creative and Suspenseful

Rating: Null/10 (8 August 2002)

*Signs*
I've read so many negative reviews on imdb about saying how this movie was "slow". Do these people have the attention span of a 4-year old? In my humble opinion it had reasons for its slow parts. Another great director did this, and it always worked. Hitchcock. And I'm not comparing M. Night Shyamalan to Hitchcock, because nobody comes close to Hitchcock. But if any director of today, Shyamalan is our closest thing to Hitchcock. Signs had a little Hitchcock with a bit of Orson Welles. Just my opinion though.
And it just makes me so mad that people would bash a great movie that is coming out in our day in age when we have such crap. I mean, Master of Disguise came out last week, maybe if you thought Signs was too slow you'll be able to keep up with that.
But for the rest of us, go see Signs. It's fabulous. And a great ending.
*8/10*