Falsely advertised, badly acted, horribly written and terribly directed piece of crap.

Rating: 1/10 (1 September 2002)

Contains Spoilers!! I'm led to believe by the trailer that it's going to be a really scary movie.
What do I get? A bible thumping "priest lost his faith" piece of crap with some crop circles and aliens thrown in so they can market it as a scary movie.
I have no problem at all if they wanted to make a movie about a priest who lost his faith, my problem is that I was mislead by the trailer they released into thinking it was something it wasn't. Had I known what this movie was going to be I wouldn't have seen it. In fact, I know a lot of people who wouldn't have seen it and I think the people in charge of marketing this movie knew it as well. That's why they released such a misleading trailer.
This movie was not scary at all. There were maybe 2 or 3 scenes that were actually scary, and the only reason I was then was because of a quiet scene suddenly interrupted by a loud noise.
I won't even get into all the problems with the plot, it's been covered already by many reviewers who have said exactly the same thing I'm saying only much better.
There were only two good actors in this movie: Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix. The chick that played the cop was just horrible.
Even worse than this movie is the people who seem to think they're smarter than the rest who say `The people who gave this movie a bad review just didn't get it.' I got the movie just fine, but it was a falsely advertised, badly acted, horribly written and terribly directed pile bat dung. I laugh even more at the people who try to excuse this piece of trash by saying `It was a dream.' I think they're wrong, and even if it was a dream from a child's point of view, that doesn't excuse the fact that it was a bad movie!
1/10Â… I want 2 hours back. The only reason I don't ask for my money back also is because it's not the theaters fault someone made a stupid movie.