I can get no... satisfaction...Yea yea yea

Rating: 6/10 (10 January 2008)

There is a check well done besides all film - art criteria when Signs" is put on the test. And that is not a surprising fact, as we well know that its creator is a man with natural talent in this respect. However "Signs" lacks on the imagination side, imagination was focused on delivering brilliant visual scenery rather than intrigue. The plot was too closed in itself, the "topography" of suspense did not manage to tingle the viewer. Action built up then suddenly faded into dramatic moments that left suspense aside. This usually would not be a big deal but when one goes to see a movie with the thematic nature of "Signs" he not only wants to see good acting, camera work and brilliant images but also wants to leave the theater in owe, shocked and by that satisfied. That is what the movie lacks.
Apart from that this is a very decent film.
6/10