*Spolier Alert* Shrek decides to find a new king rather than take the throne-huh??

Rating: Null/10 (28 November 2007)

--Spoilers-- Somehow in this edition of Shrek's adventures, Shrek decides that it would be better to install Arthur as king rather than rule himself which goes against what I think his father in law would have wanted. None of it makes any sense nor do his odd daddy isssues.
Arthur (the boy who would be king) is a nerdy poorly written character played by Justin Timberlake.(who frankly shouldn't quit his day job). He actually has the nerve to put on the crown at the end-not a very poignant ending. He could have handed it back to Shrek-but no he really needs to be King and he deserves to be.
Charming this time around is much worse than past films and simply put, not up to his mother's great villain standard. It's nice that they included Cinderella and various other fairy tale princesses, but the Saturday Night Live actresses are all wasted. You can see the writers straining while eating breakfast donuts to come up with something for them to do besides attend Fiona's baby shower.
Worst of all, the writers think it's a great idea to have Puss and Donkey change voices which is not funny and distracting from the already poor story All in all, this was a really disappointing film that lacked courage from Shrek, any heroism whatsoever, and really any reason to view it.