I find it very raunchy for a "kids movie"

Rating: Null/10 (20 May 2004)

I tell you I am not a moralist, but when it comes to children. I believe in 100% percent protection from predators. I was so disappointed with this movie. I saw the first part and I always felt that it was a little over the edge for children but still was funny and suitable for children. This movie is not a children's movie.! I don't even know how can the producers can rate it PG. This movie to my standards should have been rated Pg-13 or R, For strong sexual content and innuendo. I know these people are desperately trying to take a shot at the powerhouse that Disney corporation is, but I think they went to far with this piece of garbage. Trying to promote gay lifestyle in a "children's "film it was very inappropriate and cheap. I was almost embarrassed when my daughter ask me, why is the bartender dressed like a woman and wearing makeup. Also I wonder if the producers think is funny that some priests have molested children. Next thing we are going to see real animated sex for children under the label PG. It is ridiculous how low can people get for a buck. At least I am satisfied that my daughter didn't like it, because she hardly laughed! There was hardly anything funny it, except for the sexually suggestive and gay jokes.