This is the year of the blockbuster movies...this may be the only one that pays off

Rating: Null/10 (7 July 2004)

With a cast of seven highly capable actors and actresses you can only imagine success.Additional comic legends such as John Cleese and Jennifer Saunders add more to the humour of the first film. Everett charmed as charming. Lets not forget Puss and boots played well be Banderas and of course the original cast such As Cameron Diaz, Eddie Murphy and Mike Myers, who are well acclaimed in the movie industry.I find shrek 2 is more fun. The things i love are the medieval equivalents to modern life. Examples of this are a medieval Burger King, a starbucks and the E channel. Only with the name Me (Medievil), using the vanity mirror to broadcast television. Now if you feel that shrek 2 doesn't intune with the medieval era then to be blunt your'e sad.
This film is rated U so its main basis is to entertain children. Although of course the second installment has more adult themes due to the popularity received by adults from the first film. An issue i want to raise is Disney mocking which some of you may feel happened. Your'e wrong because all the characters who've featured in Disney films that have featured in shrek were not disneys original ideas. Cinderella and snow white were novels as were sleeping beauty and Pinocchio. I didn't see nemo, simba or any Mickey Mouse rip offs. When i saw shrek I didn't know how they'd make a sequel with a story line wrapped up. But they have so who knows how good the third installment will be. Anyone who does moan about how medieval life was and how shrek 2 does not alliterate that, I recommend Braveheart. MY RATING 4/5.. Or for IMDb 8/10