Shrek and Donkey need a better adventure

Rating: 7/10 (5 December 2004)

Much has been made about the 'gross-out' comedy that Shrek (and this sequel) relies upon for its laughs. But while this is true, in both films it is balanced by a humanism, a tenderness at times, that is embodied by Shrek himself and his relationships with Fiona and Donkey. And while there are times when the jokes seem strained, or repetitive, the emotional core of the narrative is thankfully never overplayed.
It is the general tone that makes one think fondly of the Shrek franchise, and more importantly makes it easier to overlook the missteps. But, that said, the sequel stumbles more frequently than its predecessor, due mainly to a less focused narrative. With the first film being essentially a road movie, it is wise that the filmmakers decided not to repeat that formula. Yet, they haven't explored very far. After the primary conceit of having Shrek meet the in-laws, the narrative becomes even more contrived, not least in the introduction of Puss-in-Boots (they clearly created the character before figuring how he'd fit into the plot). Despite the strained narrative, the sequel does benefit from a better-controlled pace. It accelerates into fast-paced set-pieces (like the potion retrieval) and back into the longer dialogue scenes with expert ease.
Donkey remains the funniest character, although Puss-in-Boots is a welcome addition. He's the only good new character, actually. The king and queen aren't much of a presence (although I enjoyed the frog scene), and the fairy godmother could have been given better lines (the diet jokes were just not funny).
Overall, it's solid enough entertainment. They should lay off the pop culture references and make the soundtrack a little less prolific next time, though.