I never expected to like a Sherlock Holmes movie this much...

Rating: 9/10 (19 February 2010)

Much like Fantastic Mr. Fox bears its traits of Wes Anderson, Sherlock Holmes has its fair share of Guy Ritchie characteristics. Ritchie, who is known for British films such as Snatch and Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, boldly constructs this film in a much more action-way than the readers of Sherlock Holmes books are probably familiar with. Ritchie feels right at home as he crafts out the story, which features top-notch performances from Robert Downey Jr as Sherlock Holmes and Jude Law as Watson. The film has the right ingredients as it is the perfect blend of action, mystery and comedy. Nearly every aspect of Sherlock Holmes was put together properly and matched the feeling of the story. The dialogue, especially the back-and-fourths between Holmes and Watson are intelligent, witty, and well-written. The editing and style in which it was shot completely emphasize the action of the film, which draw in the audiences full attention. The film moves rather quickly, which can be attributed to many different things such as rapid dialogue, stealthy movements of the actors to the scene length. The movie also captures the England, mid-1860's feeling perfectly. As a final note, Rachel McAdams was most definitely out of place. Her sex appeal can only carry the role so far and while her physical acting is a plus (speaking of styles of acting...Downey reigns supreme in this film as his acting, from his quick retorts to his body language to the look on his face right after Watson saves him from being crushed by a mill-type object is flawless) she simply doesn't have the right voice for the role. By no means is it McAdams' fault, nor do I think she was miscast...I simply believe her voice just didn't do the character justice. All in all, Sherlock Holmes is a gritty, action-packed, wild ride that features some very strong performances and great directing from Ritchie.