This was the Academy Awards most unforgivable mistake!!

Rating: 7/10 (12 December 2012)

This is a fine movie, but absolutely not an Oscar worthy one! And most certainly NOT AN 7 Oscars worthy one! They totally wasted those nominations on this thing! Sure, the acting was good and funny, but it's not a 7 Oscar worthy movie. The movie is funny, is interesting as seen from the perspective of the famous Shakespeare life, but good grace, people need to look more wide at the screen. It transmitted nothing to me. It was almost like a musical at some points. It's amazing how Oscars pop up when actresses begin to take their clothes off and the movie is rated R for sexuality. Gwyneth Paltrow was naked half of this movie. And those passion scenes were so unrealistic and pathetic that they really bored me. And it's too long! I felt like it was never going to end already after an hour of viewing. Geoffrey Rush got nominated for this piece of waste for best supporting actor and he didn't even won. He should have been nominated for best supporting actor in "Les miserables" and he surely would have won. But as I said those at the Academy Awards were so blind that I won't waste my words anymore for them.
I'm not saying it's a terrible movie. Not at all. Watch it people, but it's not a 7 Oscars worthy. And not even a 7,2 rated movie. It's way, way overrated. Put a couple Oscars more and it reaches "Gone with the wind"! How in God's name would this sound? It's really pathetic. Gwyneth Paltrow is a good actress and I love her, but this movie didn't suit her. I don't like Joesph Fiennes. He acts like a macho, not an actor, in Elizabeth he acted the same way. He is not the actor that everyone praise, his brother Ralph is way more talented and has a lot more potential. Anyway, as a viewer I was disappointed. Good movie, but not the way it's shown for sure.
7\10