This movie says that sequels suck and proves it!

Rating: 4/10 (18 February 2000)

I did not have high expectations for this sequel of the overrated Scream, and I didn't get much. What I got was a good discussion about sequels, appearances by Randy and Dewey(the only characters I liked in Scream) and a pointless slasher with an even weaker story than the first one. I didn't like the characters in the first Scream. They annoyed me. Well, the characters in this one are replacements for the victims of the first movie and survivors of Scream. So I hated the characters in this one as well. It is even less frightening than the first one!!! The fresh side of the first one is not there anymore(the movie is almost identical to the original Scream). You know the scenes before you have seen them, since they are the same as the original Scream, and when I say same, I really mean SAME. But as they say in this movie, sequels suck... The killer(or maybe... killerS...) was logical in the first one but this time, it's so stupid(------ SPOILER WARNING: I mean, come on, they introduce a character that you knew nothing about at the end and say it's one of the killers... This makes it impossible to get that "How could HE do that" feeling. And another thing, maybe I found this one even weaker than the first one because they killed the best character, Randy. Randy was the best character and they KILLED HIM!------END OF SPOILER---------- Anyway, Scream 2 is even weaker than the first one in my opinion. Still, it's an above-average slasher, much better than craps like Urban Legends and I Know What You Did Last Summer, and all the other "sons of Scream". But, again, that doesn't make it a good movie.

4 out of 10.