What the... ?

Rating: 10/10 (9 October 1999)

Are you people retarded or just plain stupid? "No likable characters", "no suspense", "poor performance by Neve Campbell"... What the hell are you people on? This is by far THE best horror sequel of all time. Much more solid than ever before, the horror genre reached it's peak with this film's release. Someone here wrote that the killers were not significant to the story.... Hum, did you even WATCH the movie, or did you just scan through it? The killers here were even more relevant than in the first one. Granted, it couldn't have happened without the first one, but darn... Also someone wrote that there is one death every five minutes. Were you drunk when you watched the movie? After the first ten minutes, there's not a death scene in over an hour. I loved the first one, and to try to top it was a little too much to ask for. But this movie gave one heck of a fight to try to do it, and I personally think it did in fact top it. The person who wrote that Wes Craven never has likable characters... You need to get those arrows out of your ass. Johnny Depp and Heather Langenkamp from "Nightmare on Elm Street"? Julie in "Wes Craven's New Nightmare"? Angela Bassett in "Vampire in Brooklyn"? And ALL the characters in "Scream" and "Scream 2"? Even the bitchy ones were rendered entertaining. I was left literally with my mouth wide open while reading your comments. You trash brilliant movies like this, and praise such idiotic, trashy and terrible films like "The Waterboy", "Big Daddy" and other complete and utter s***. I can't wait for "Scr3am", because they say it's more mature than the two others, which is just what this series needs; one more excellent entry to make this the best horror series in history. Praise Wes Craven, Kevin Williamson, Neve Campbell, and everybody else attached to either films.