I'm surprised how many people liked this movie.

Rating: 2/10 (17 April 2006)

Let me just say that if you liked this movie, good for you, I am just expressing my thoughts about how amateur this movie is. My opinion is that true horror films do not use blood and guts alone to make it a block-buster. Take an old Alfred Hitchcock movie, lets say Psycho for an example. Sleek, thrilling, magnificently creepy, a huge twist at the end, and totally controversial for it's time (Even though it spawned a whole bunch of crappy sequels, but hey, what horror movie doesn't?). To me, this was not a true horror film, but a bucket of meaningless blood and gore passing itself off to be horror. But again, this movie might be or some of you fans of "new age" horror flicks, but for us fans of the old Hitchcock classics like the Birds and Psycho this movie is not our style.