terrible.

Rating: 1/10 (29 October 2006)

I just came back from viewing saw III, and I must say that it is probably the most intricately woven piece of crap I've ever seen. Fortunately for my sake, I went into the movie with low expectations so I ended up being only slightly disappointed. My main problem with the film is that it makes a very tired attempt at masking it's characteristics of a snuff film by throwing in a shoddy storyline, sub-par dialogue, and a handful of excessively mediocre plot-twists. HOLY S*** SAW-PEOPLE! YOU'VE PIECED TOGETHER NOT JUST ONE, BUT SEVERAL WEAK MONTAGES OF RANDOM FLASHBACKS SUPPORTED BY THE SAME LAME MUSIC FOR EVERY SEQUENCE... unimpressed. In addition, the logical inconsistencies are beyond abundant, but the film's realism (or lack thereof) is a factor of considerably less importance in determining the value of this film. To be honest- I don't have the motivation to expose what a travesty this movie really is, because it's more than capable of proving this without my assistance. In summation, I do not regret seeing this film, because it has provided me with some much needed blog-fodder. To the reader I must say: I could care less whether or not you see the film or not, but consider yourself warned, because if you do choose to watch this train-wreck of a motion picture you'll have no one to blame but yourself for "wasting 8 bucks". Not since Mel's Passion of the Christ has a snuff film attempted to pass for something more. What's even more disappointing is that, through the unintentional support of viewers like myself and the intentional support of the legions of retards comprising the movie-going public, the saw enterprise will continue to discharge more cinematic dysentery for many a Halloween to come. What's even more disappointing is that it's received a collective rating of over 7 stars, am I the only one who's shocked? That's it for this review- I'm going to watch something with some redemptive values like Monty Python.