A bad way to finish the trilogy

Rating: 3/10 (3 December 2006)

What I don't understand is how people are saying this is like the very first saw when in my opinion it is nothing like the first saw.
The problem with this movie is that the first saw ever made was so good. It was about time someone made a horror movie that weren't a typical teen one. By that I mean sex scene, axe murderer comes up behind kills person number 1, runs after person number 2. Person number 2 falls over a leaf and then is killed *this bit to graphic to explain*.
The very first saw was not that it was graphical but it was psychological. You never knew what was going on and through out the whole film you were guessing. The film was excellent at controlling your mind.
It makes me wonder what happened to the "psychology" that made that film so great. Saw 2 and Saw 3 are nothing but gore fest films. All films have a good ending but only 1 film concentrated on the storyline on the way to the ending which was the very first film. I like Saw and Saw 2 in a way. But when I heard Saw 3 was like Saw 1 I was left disappointed. If you think you're in for a psychological treat that'll keep you guessing then you're going to be disappointed. In fact the whole movie is just a little bit predictable. A bad way to finish the trilogy in my opinion.