revolting and frankly meaningless

Rating: 4/10 (12 January 2006)

The only thing I'd save is the twisty ending (as twisty as the prequel finale) but, apart from that, I found no positive notes, in spite of the bigger budget and of the certainly bigger expectations. Too may scenes are needlessly disgusting and besides, when a horror movie is only revolting without showing the audience something different from mere violence and bloodshed, well, it means the film is not worth watching and nothing did work; that's why the only reason why somebody could (not should) be interested in going to theaters and watching this sequel is the memory of the premise. This picture then has no famous actor nor significant character, therefore the conclusion is that no one, except for affectionate fans, should waste time and money.