So let me get this straight. **spoiler**

Rating: 1/10 (30 October 2005)

I remember a few weeks before this movies release my friend and I were discussing what was going to happen in this sequel. He stated as a joke that it would be Amanda who'll take John's place in his sick games. The sad part was.. he was right.
After sitting through the movie I enjoyed every second of the film but what upsets me the most was the ending. In the first you don't know who it is so that what kept me occupied. In the second, we see that it is Amanda(who is the only one to survive Johns deadly games)who is learning John's ways.
How did a heroin addict become fascinated with the jigsaw games. Wasn't she scared half to death when she was in one? I'm sorry but I just don't see her character coming to take the place of John. I personally just saw her as the only victim to survive, nothing more. Now, they decided to reuse her character and make her part of Johns games. I didn't buy that. Her character in the first one did not seem psychopathic in anyway. However, these writers are getting carried away with their ideas and that just destroyed the ending for me. I was expecting something else rather than "Amanda" who isn't even really seen that much in the first one and is now a main character in this film.
I tell you, thees writers must've thought they could pull this off.. they were wrong.
A man as a live or die game creator sounds more scary then a heroin addict who survived one of the games and has a stupid voice. It's almost like a kid pretending to be the Jigsawkiller. She's horrible. The idea was horrible. the second one will never be as good as the first. Enough said.