Saw 2 breaks traditional sequel suckage.

Rating: 9/10 (1 November 2005)

I just seen the flick for the third time last night and I've got to say, it doesn't disappoint. It offers all that the first one had to offer and then some. My only gripe with the film is that it had too many center characters. With the film running at roughly an hour and a half, it's hard to focus on all of the cast and give them their own story. So if and when the next one comes out, I'd suggest keeping it down to three or less central characters (with side character killings ala Saw 1) or bump up the length to around two hours. All in all though, it was a great movie in a genre that seems to have ran dry of ideas. I give it a 9/10.