Are you kidding?

Rating: 1/10 (15 December 2005)

Now, let's just admit something first off, horror movies aren't my favorite. I liked "Dawn of the Dead" especially with an awesome use of that Johnny Cash song based on the book of Revelation. I also liked Cabin Fever (shut up, I know). I'm more into comedy from Life Aquatic quirky to Waterboy stupid.
It's not so much that this movie was a bad production, it's just the motivation behind it. What's the point? We've got a movie that's violent for the sake of being violent...almost like the movie makers just get off on it. And hey, I've seen some weird fetishes, so it's not really surprising. I especially get this from the "Trivia" at the bottom of the IMDb page.
This may be more of a critique of the IMDb system than anything but half of these glowing reviews just have to be fake. Again, don't act surprised. Look, we've got guys comparing it to The Shining, and giving it equal ratings to King Kong and 2001. That MUST be a joke...yes, surprise, surprise! There are TONS of fake reviews on IMDb...yet this movie seems to have more than it's share.
Side note...HOW TO SPOT FAKE REVIEWS: 1) The reviewer only has like 2 movies to his or her credit. 2) Out of control hyperbole. 3) Way too much detail.
OK, it's not NEARLY as bad as "House of the Dead" (based on a Sega game) but it's not "mind blowing" or whatever bull crap the filmmakers are on here passing off as a legitimate review.
I like a good scary movie, this is not one of them. This is a "gross out" movie. Kind of like the American Pie movies (which I thought were funny) but with killing instead of pubes on a wedding cake.