Saw II--Good, or bad?

Rating: 5/10 (24 November 2005)

I don't know exactly how I felt about Saw II. The ending was a little bit confusing for me. Although I don't want to give away anything, the ending seemed to me like it didn't exactly fit together with the rest of the movie. Parts of it did, but there were also parts where I sat there thinking, "What? There's no way in hell that could've happened." If you've seen Saw I, and if you're looking at this, I'm sure you have, you know that "Jigsaw" is the old man with cancer at the beginning of the movie. How does an elderly man that's dying pull all that off? It's not probable, but then again, I don't really think anyone could pull that off with absolutely no flaws.
The 1st one was definitely a lot better, but what do you expect, right? With a movie like that, it's almost predictable that they will make a second one, but stupid at the same time, because you know by even looking at the previews that it's not going to be as good.
Anddddd, judging by the ending of the second one, I'm almost sure that they're going to make a 3rd one. I'd recommend renting the 3rd and 2nd ones, because the second one is almost a waste of 9 dollars, and the 3rd one I can almost guarantee will be a waste.
Saw II will keep you thinking though. Not that the 1st one didn't. But, hey, if you like that sort of thing, I'd recommend seeing it.