The first SAW was MUCH MUCH better!

Rating: 3/10 (11 February 2006)

In SAW, the original and first film about the "jigsaw-killer", you really had suspense. There was this exciting "relation" of the Dr and Adam, that always changed, and the end of SAW - be honest - was absolutely amazing and just great. Of course, SAW was pretty bloody and sadistic but there was something like a story, which I was looking for in SAW 2. What is this in SAW II? It seems like several movie makers put their home-sadistic-dreams together and looked how they could surpass the violence of the first part. It's just sick: The idea of the first (unnecessary) victim and his "mask". "Cut your eye out, take the key and free yourself in 60 seconds - HA HA". Always this damn stupid laughter of "jigsaw"! Why? I'm very upset about many movie continuations (Matrix 2 or 3 were horrable, Jurassic Park 2 and 3 were also very bad, Scary Movie 2 was unbelievably bad...) but I hoped that SAW II could be good though. Very disappointing, SAW II. The most upsetting fact is that the ex-junkie that survived the first trap of "jigsaw" is now again in a "trap" for her and she really wants to go on these insane games because "jigsaw helped" her. Could it get any worse? Hollywood wants to make a lot of more money with "jigsaw" or his "offspring", nothing more. The 3-vote of me is because of the surprising end that gave SAW 2 at least a very little "updraft". If you saw "SAW" then don't watch "SAW II" - better remind yourself of some good horror, something special, not on a stupid continuation.