Good?? No...

Rating: 3/10 (21 February 2006)

First of all: Saw I was a pretty good film, but most of all it had an interesting story. So the question is: How could they make such a bad movie? It is not all that interesting to see several steapid people running around in a house. OK, no, let's put it this way, it could be interesting and scary if the director would not only use the 'scary' effect of flickering scenes (several takes/ scenes per second) and screeming dummies. A bummer, but bad movies have to be made to get to the good stuff, forget this one and wait for Saw III! *spoiler* 'You wouldn't know the things you loose when you're locked away'--> How about that!! What a good reason to participate in these funny games HAHAHAHAAHH; what a turkey!