SPOILER: Is it pacifism or is it lack of direction?

Rating: 3/10 (3 September 2001)

A script that begins with a credible concept of wartime legal necessity, then winds up at the dead end of a Private baldly disobeying a superior officer - and STAYING in the war - is almost unworthy of comment. More believable scenarios (with laugh-track) came out of "Hogan's Heroes".
Maybe there's a pacifist motivation in having the guy disobey his superior, then having the superior meaninglessly die. ("War - what is it good for?") But the other half of that 50% chance is that the writer or writers just didn't know what else to do with this thing. After all, they clearly didn't intend to write "Midway" or "Patton".