Why do filmmakers feel like they must manipulate viewers so?

Rating: 4/10 (15 November 2000)

Prior to seeing this film, I had heard only positive feedback. I went into it expecting great things. And I guess, yes, it was a good film. The action sequences are awesome--very realistic. The fighting scenes are incredibly moving and (as far as I can tell, I wasn't there) authentic. But, geez, what was with the beginning and the end? It would have been a great film without those shmaltzy sequences. Do we really need the director to SHOW us just how much of an impact Captain John had on Private Ryan? Can't anything be left to the imagination?
This film reminds me of Forrest Gump in its (blatant) manipulation of the viewing public. My plea to directors is let us watch and judge the merits of the characters, don't tell us he's everyman, so then we will melt, cry and react emotionally! We are smarter than you think. Really! We will get it without the affectations and overt pulls at the heartstrings. What ever happened to subtlety in film? I am sorry for those of you who think this is the best film you've ever seen. Watch a few more movies before you make such comments. Or maybe, just learn to watch what you do watch more critically. Don't let yourselves be manipulated.