Not what it could be

Rating: 2/10 (23 May 2017)

After watching a movie, the first thing I think to myself us "Why was this movie made? What were the writers trying to get across to the viewer?" Honestly, the only reason for this movie to exist that I can think of is to push the boundaries of what we precise as decent. Personally, I'm not a big fan of movies that only exist to be raunchy (as you may be able to tell), but this movie is different. The way they try to sexualize food, and build sexual tension between food items hits every nerve in the human body that evokes disgust.
Now, that's one reason to dislike this movie, but that's not why I dislike it. The reason I dislike it, is because it takes itself too seriously. The minute they tried getting preachy, or incorporating social commentary, I couldn't stand it. Imagine someone walks up to you, Jacks off in your face, and makes a bunch of crappy jokes about rape, and then suddenly tries to talk politics with you, and expects to be taken seriously. That's how it felt watching this movie. As an audience member, I felt insulted that this was the mental standard I was being held to.
In conclusion, if I were to use one word to describe this movie, it would be 'pretentious'. It was clearly made by a bunch of rich people with no talent who just wanted to push boundaries, and spark controversy. All in all, I would rate 2/10.