When not watching the trailer would have paid off

Rating: 10/10 (3 January 2014)

Trailers these days ruin movies more than Kevin Costner could ever hope to achieve. The trailer for this movie is kind of an anti-trailer. I was fooled into thinking that I was about to watch a movie about Chris Hemsworth's character, which isn't too much of a stretch considering he must have at least 75% of the scenes in the trailer.
But this was not Chris Hemsworth's movie, far from it. This was Daniel Brole(?)'s movie. I added a question mark because I still don't know his name after watching the trailer, the movie and consequently obsessing over the information surrounding the actual events. It's either Brole or Brule and it has an accent.
I'm still on the trailer, there's more to be said. It was one of the best trailers in recent history, simply due to the fact that it didn't give the entire movie away. If I hadn't seen the trailer before watching the movie, I don't think I would have had the same experience. Not only did it not spoil the movie, it prepared me for some obscure historical event from the bottom of the bag being massacred into a motion picture.
wow incoherent rambling review much? such amaze so wow. All I've done was talk about the trailer. 10 stars 100% on rotten tomatoes. There are some amazing movies that you'd never want to watch again, I'll see in five or ten years if this one is one of them. I've watched National Lampoon's Senior Trip (Jeremy Renner's first role) at least a dozen times, but it's a pretty terrible movie.
Rush is good rush is great it was my favourite movie this year it kinda played out like an Ayn rand novel and I wonder if Niki Lauda was into her at all, since he seems.... kinda fricked (WHY CAN'T I USE PROFANITY IN MY REVIEW, THAT'S INSANE IT'S 2013 GET YOUR STUPID STUFF TOGETHER GUYS. THE WOLF OF WALL STREET SAID FRICK OVER 400 FRICKING TIMES AND I CAN'T POST A REVIEW SAYING IT ONCE?????????) up like those people tend to be.