Court evidence

Rating: 7/10 (31 January 2003)

I have seen this movie twice now, and the first time I really liked it. I still think it's a decent movie, but two things really bother me:
1: One of the pictures presented in the courtroom shows scorchmarks from molotov cocktails 10-15 feet up on the embassy's walls. It shouldn't be too hard to prove that those molotov cocktails could not have been thrown from buildings that are at least 50 yards away. This means that they would have been thrown from the crowd. In other words; the tape that becomes one of the main turning points of the movie isn't really necessary to prove the case.
2: Don't you just hate it when they tell you what happens to the characters afterwards to give the impression that it's an authentic story when it's not?