new review 2011 james bond some spoil waiting qos b23

Rating: 9/10 (22 May 2011)

Ratings will be short and without tails - a sign of our times, there is a crisis everywhere, and something I need to stand out. The crisis has also reached and Bond (James of course). Watching it a while ago (like the dishes are gone dear children) do not even suspect that the interval between the next installment will be so long. While the 90 Bond reached the disintegration of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (and some have postulated that he went to the well-deserved retirement), but this time he managed to come back (with a Polish accent, of course!).
But nowadays it back hanging by a thread (still hanging in fact, because the Bond number on the plan broke down in 1923 not even a single slate - at least officially), so we are left with only the last part of the review. Perhaps this is related to the storyline last film.
3 years ago James Bond decided to go back. Since the last part he managed to pack one very important man to the trunk, in this part of the man must bring to the hearing i. .. heard.
Turns out, however, that Bond's world (and as news of the closed municipal blogs actresses will also carry this in the next section) is different than it was before. While in the previous episode lost beloved, this has to fight an enemy who does not want to take over the world - he (or rather she / it) dominates the world (incidentally, this may be a reason no B23 for at least a year-fools revenge?).
Paradoxically, despite gasoline prices on the gold of our stations where you can do enormous profits (though no one is asking the questions why?) Is ... water! Yes yes H20, aqua or whatever language you call anywhere in the world. Although probably under a latitudes and longitudes it could be a sugar ...
James Bond, this time alone, maybe this is not entirely true, but the firing bad girl (where vengeance and justice turns out relative terms - as important, if by August this year the alleged murder of Bin Laden) is not something that usually support having an agent of Her Majesty he could call it protecting the back, especially at critical moments.
Is so it is worth to watch this movie? Yes, because there is no next Bond. Yes, because the competition is still not able to do something in his class (even if it has shed the old habits). Yes, if only because we see Oone Castille (descending from Chaplin-sic) in her small but well-reel moves.
Yes he can still attract Bond to the screen, even though the plane is a year where you age (though this is not ancient Hercules Polish Army, but this DC-3 is not the peak of the possibility of the aviation industry). So what is this film? Still the same as a book writer - another adventure guy, who still is the ideal for men and women (bisexual probably too!).
Strange but true. I think that despite ACHIEVEMENT OF RIGHT century (though there are some agents named Tom, who chose to retire in August and age ~ 30) this film is still worthy of a look. You can (like everything else earns good money) to call him rubbish because I gained a few hundred percent of the inserted financial resources.
But let's not forget that this is an ambitious film, because MGM has (had) the financial troubles. Quite the need to escape the product placement and sponsorship outside company and the profits from the previous August dissolved somewhere.
So this film with Mr. B., who are still able to overcome the whole world alone is worthy of a look. And like most probably watch the next, because the latter was not bad. Especially with how the> 60 year old looks quite young and nice shot catching the bad guys.
It is a pity the same can not be young forever carrying on such a pleasant, immortal life ....