Many misunderstood this movie.

Rating: 8/10 (4 February 2011)

Some says that this is a crap. Critics that this movie is awful. But they don't really get the point. The point is that, this movie is part of a reboot. Therefore his genesis in his 007 status. During Moore Era, they criticized the those movies because of it's some comedic acts of the Bond. In Brosnan Era, they reacted that those movies is a gadget presentation. Now, here is the darker Bond and they are criticizing it. And the Aficionados(?), they said that Craig is no Bond because he's only 5"10-5"11 against 6"1-6"2 height of previous Bonds, also an sluggish type. But what's more important is the storyline and the character itself. Forget the looks.
I watched this movie and I found out that it was good but not as good as what Casino Royale did but you cannot understand well the story without having watch the Casino Royale. Craig's Credibility is excellent and that proves that there's far more important than looks, humours, and gadgets. Here, he is always learn his lessons which is an absence to previous Bond pics. Olga Kurylenko is also respectable in her performance as Camille Montes and you don't need a double intender- name.
One thing that I really appreciate here; although he commit sex with Strawberry Fields, he never make a bed scene with Camille.