for real?

Rating: 8/10 (29 November 2008)

oh people come on. i watched the film, and i was absolutely ready for a bad film, mostly because i don't like Krylenko. now movie started and the first action scene wasn't appealing to me - MTV style, Bourn style, w/e. not cool.
but after that, movie start building itself, and i started to like it. mostly because, like a lot of people mentioned, this is a different bond, and its a way more realistic one. no gadgets, no stupid shooting scenes, all stunts are very well thought out and realistic. you, you complain about it? like you wanted a Bond, James Bond every 20 minutes in this movie too? Shake, not stir? now that would make this film horrible. this franchise is old, it needs something new, jokes told over and over are not that funny. and this film delivers it, the new idea. and i for one liked it, i dislike the editing, yes, but the whole movie is nice.
its not epic, like someone said Oh No Bond Is Not Saving The World but a people in some 3rd world country. oh i see saving world of course is so much more important then helping people in a some god forgotten Bolivia :D
I would recommend this movie to pass an evening, just not if you are hardcore old school bond fan, then, yes, you will miss gadgets, sexual jokes, stirring, shaking, etc. if you want to see a well filmed movie with a questionable editing that still delivers - shoot it.