Great action movie, horrible, terrible and awful James Bond movie.

Rating: 1/10 (27 September 2009)

First of all.
The cars. The first car was an awesome Austin Martin which had bulletproof glasses. Nothing else. Why leave out the rockets, machine guns and missiles? I don't know, and I am starting to loose interest. The second car was some random car, and so was the third.
Second.
The story. The story was better than Casino Royale, but was more like a random action movie story.
Third.
Where is the "Bond, James Bond" line? What James Bond movie does not have this line?
Fourth.
Where was Q? Why do they hate Q?
Fifth.
James Bond. Daniel Craig is a great and brilliant actor, but an awful James Bond. Bring back Pierce Brosnan.
Sixth.
The filming. The camera work was not good at all. It reminded me of a school project. And what's with the CG? I know the CG scenes are dangerous to film in real life, but If you need CG, at least make it better! I thought for a second it was a game.
As an action movie, I give it 8/10. As a James Bond movie, I give it 1/10.
This movie would be brilliant if they had changed the title something different than James Bond, and changed the names.