Why no Campbell or Fleming

Rating: 8/10 (13 November 2008)

I don't understand why after the wonderful film that Campbell did the studios couldn't do more to bring him in on the second MOVIE. Now we have this action packed MOVIE that lacks the passion with which it was stated they were going to do in bringing back the Bond films. Forster is not bad director, however the films that he has made in the past do not really translate into the type of man needed for the hyped new Bond film. I suppose i might just be ranting and raving, it could be the fact that there was no Ian Fleming story to fallow. But that begs the question; why didn't they make the first movie with the intention of being able to fallow another Fleming book. I would have rather seen two or three really good new Bond films based on Fleming books, than a long list of bad MOVIES that aren't based on the books.