The type of movie I would've loved when I was thirteen

Rating: 4/10 (25 February 2008)

Some observations:
1. Anytime your most admiring audience is comprised of 17-year-old males you know you're in trouble.
2. Anytime the most common adjective used to describe your movie is "cool" you know you're in trouble.
This is a silly, juvenile, vulgar movie. Tarantino should have had the courage to make a cheap, violent, trashy Hollywood-style movie and been proud of it. Instead, he made a cheap, violent, trashy, Hollywood-style movie and hid behind the "irony" façade. Works for 17-year-olds, doesn't work for the rest of us.