Everyone Has Their Own Nonsense !

Rating: 3/10 (21 December 2008)

Save all the sophisticated Yada, Yada, Yada, and all the smart Blah, Blah, Blah. I watched it 3 times trying my best to like it, though it failed big time to leave any effect but disgust, silliness, and being provocatively absurd; and maybe that's Quentin Tarantino's original dream purely! It is the ultimate boring nonsense, and it's proud of itself too. OH MY GOD, how did Tarantino manage to persuade all of these stars to do it in the first place, I swear this is a mystery for me!
Though, at certain piece in my mind, I have to "respect" its script somehow, because its different structure, and revolutionary sense. It succeeded to be a cheap novel which has been published cheaply in not well-ordered pages. It left its clear mark on all the crime movies after, with some followers that range between ugly and uglier. And still it's the most artistic movie made by Tarantino yet. WAW, I can be objective to surprising extent!
But, in the same time, this movie is as dull as Harvey Keitel's face, as meaningless as how Bruce Willis seemed, and as unfunny as Uma Thurman is. It's wholly non-enjoyable, highly sickening, and a special torture to watch. I ranked it in my list of the worst 10 movies I've have ever seen, which makes me the biggest misfit among all the mad lovers of it. It's the forever tragedy of being in love with the usual: (2001: A Space Odyssey), (The Godfather: Part II), (Chinatown), etc.. As if loving and appreciating them make you a well cultured movie buff, and a venerable thoughtful brain! But you know what? I don't love them at all, I love (Die Hard 1), (The Guns of Navarone), and (The Boy Who Could Fly), and for any one who dares to veto, then let's step outside!
Huh? It won the Oscar, So what? Some people yearly gather, at the Oscars or else, to select the fine movie from THEIR point of view, and simply this one isn't fine from MY point of view. I may care about its novelty, but I won't give a hoot about its characters, atmosphere, or world. Any movie that has Christopher Walken narrating such a nauseating story about some watch in some war--is definitely not for me WHATEVER THE GREAT MEANING BEHIND THAT ANYWAY! Even the plot, yes it's variant and motivating, but not smart. Its final result was something so ridiculous and cold. It's anti-formulaic yet produced a sleepy doped up crime movie. It's not the case of style prevailed narration, it's a case of style killed the narration (if there was any!), to show off what looked eventually like oddity for oddity.
After so many movies by Tarantino, it's official: the man is a master of nonsense, who's so educated when it comes to the internationally cinematic nonsense history, and so creative in producing lots and lots of highly manufactured nonsense. However, sometimes he makes movies about uninteresting people in uninteresting ways, recycling the old nonsense into new forms, making it perfectly interesting for anyone but me! I don't hate Tarantino, but I hate Tarantino's (Pulp Fiction). Sorry, not my kind of nonsense.