classical? why not?

Rating: Null/10 (12 May 2003)

before having the pulp fiction dvd, i had heard people say it so brilliant again and again. in the top 250 movies list, it ranks 19. and i knew it had won the best film award in 1994 Canne. naturally, i should be longing for this movie for years, just as for memento, usual suspects or mulholland drive. yes, i found it at last in the dvd shop. i would not wast a second to play it in my laptop. roughly 3 hours' glance imprinted another classical in my mind. Queutin, the director, is a genius. the theme of love and redemption was presented in such a moving way. the 3(or 4) seem to be independent, while they are inter-related. the chronical order of narration was broken apart and replaced by a confused disarrangement. in the second scene, jules shot a man down for his boss and then the movie turned to the fourth secene when jules and vincent were already in their boss' place. only at the end of moive, the skipped part of jules' redemption, the main theme of the film, was presented on the screen. why this?? the period of the rougly 3hours of the film is simply indicating the whole long process of jules' salvation. the magic bullets inspired jules of god's love that persuaded him to put the pistol aside in the restaurant and quit the gangs life(he did do so, for in the latter part he didn't show again); however. in contrary, vincent didn't realize this and stayed in, thus he was killed by potch just like a tomato that failed to catch up getting smashed up and becoming ketchup! this movie deserves such a reputation and is worth reviewing hundreds of times. thankx, Queutin!