This is an ANTI-drug, ANTI-violence film

Rating: Null/10 (25 September 1998)

THIS MESSAGE CONTAINS SPOILERS. DON'T READ UNLESS YOU HAVE SEEN THE MOVIE OR YOU HAVE NO DESIRE TO.
I'm reading a lot of these messages condemning Tarantino for making a pro-drug, pro-violence movie? Hello? Did we see different movies?
Just because a director SHOWS drugs or violence doesn't mean that they condone them. Did anyone watch Uma Thurman's overdose scene and react by craving smack? And about the violence...of the three leads (Travolta, Jackson, and Willis), only Travolta is committed to a life of violence, and he ends up dead in a toilet. Willis' character is redeemed by saving the life of his arch enemy, and Jackson's "holy" revelation leads him to reject the violent life of a hitman.
Any film that takes place in the criminal underworld has to show the viewer elements of sex, drugs, and violence or else lose all credibility. Deeper analysis of this film, however, shows it to be one of the most morally present films of the '90's.