Good ending,but time will hurt this film.

Rating: Null/10 (13 May 2008)

This film started somehow,and the whole film seemed good for first look.As I can remember my mother sad some-when at the middle of the 90-S,this is a famous film.I had seen the Gus Van Sant-version,and cause I know that is almost the same,(in some parts almost from cut,to cut)and I wanted to read what negative reviews says about the original,and the remake.I was surprised,some of the negative comments are not says incoherent things about it.If you will do the same,you can see,what is the point,or thing where your,and others opinion not the same.And this is a great thing.Alright,I know you knew what I'am talking about,I just wanted to say:that is a very good thing,if you have opinion,about this film,cause Psycho(1960),has some interesting points,(the ending,the concept,or the visuals)but all the way I can see problems,with the same points.Against typical 60,S-Alfred style not send to the bed the whole creature,but all the way the style,the written,the characters,and some other little things could have been so much better,or different.But if you loved this film,seemed like time,and the major part of the IMDb-users are still agreeing with you.