Astonished at the Good Reviews

Rating: 1/10 (15 February 2015)

Even the venerable Roger Ebert (RIP) said nice things about this movie. RottenTomatoes scores it 73% and on IMDb it's a 7. All of which shakes my trust in Reviews to the core. Suckered, I paid good money for a ticket, and the 3d glasses, and I got the best seat in the house (easy, as the cinema was totally empty apart from me - word had gotten round, it seems), so I enjoyed perfect 3d vision of the lovely CGI, and the utterly dreadful movie that contained it.
All the other low-star reviews have detailed what's wrong with this movie (basically, everything but the CGI), so I needn't repeat. What they haven't addressed is why. And the overall high ratings maybe offer a reason: Ed Wood was right, after all, the audience doesn't care, won't notice, you can't insult their intelligence because they haven't got one.
I see they're making a sequel. What a waste. The title should have been Alienate, as that's what it did for me. Goodbye Ridley, you did some good stuff back in the day, shouldn't you be retired by now?