Awful, just awful.

Rating: 1/10 (18 June 2012)

I _HAD_ to become a registered member of IMDb, just to write this review.
I think I speak for every man, woman and child with at least an ounce of active brain matter left, when I say that the FBI should launch a formal investigation into how a movie as terrible as this was allowed to come into existence, and the people responsible should be tracked down and prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Preferably, a public b*******g or g*****g should take place, and if laws to enforce this are not in place, they should be written and applied retroactively.
I clicked the "Contains Spoiler" check box when writing this review, but I'm obliged to say - there is really nothing to spoil. The movie fails miserably at coming even remotely close to anything that makes any sense whatsoever at any point in time.
The writing, the acting, the directing, the editing ... _EVERYTHING_ is way below par. I can't really think of one good thing in the whole movie. It's awful, really, just awful.
There are only two things that could have possibly allowed this atrocity to be unleashed upon mankind: 1) Ridley Scott has started doing crystal meth. 2) Ridley Scott's family was abducted, held at gun point, and he was forced to make some of the worst, most despicable and vile decisions ever made by any man.
I hope to God it's the latter, and Ridley has been running some kind of underground film-rebellion-guerrilla-unit that has managed to secure some decent footage, and we'll be fortunate enough to see a Director's Cut of this, that, as opposed to the original, does not suck donkey balls in every way imaginable.
P.S. Ridley, if you need help springing your family from captivity, let me know. Whoever made you produce this ... this ... piece of ... cinema ... is now a sworn enemy of mine, and I'd rather die fighting for your rights to make films the way you used to, than have to endure another two hours stuck in a dark movie theater with something like THIS.