Illogic and misleading

Rating: 7/10 (15 June 2012)

The movie is talking about a concept which many people actually have research and studied on; Ancient Astronauts. It's very much possible that we (humans) are the product of genetic engineering by some Gods (aliens), but I'm pretty sure that what was shown in the movie is not the case. In it, the director is referring to some paintings that do exists but has no reference to what the "dr" is talking about. For instance, there's a scene in which the mission director is referring to the depiction of Pakal the king of Mayans and talking about star formations, obliviously there are no star formations in that sculpture. Regardless of the main idea, there were many mistakes and illogical errors that just doesn't make sense. It's illogical because many things that was shown in the movie are not physical and biological possible, and I'm not talking about DNA engineering and creation humans, I'm talking about very basic common sense things. It's misleading because I couldn't find any point in it, what was the director trying to say? Was he trying to tell us anything after all? Maybe I'm expecting too much. I believe this movie is not meant for people who are interested and have studied about the idea of Ancient Astronauts. This movie is good for people who watch movies just for the sake of watching something, not to learn or develop an idea.