A very good adaptation with no flaws

Rating: 10/10 (11 March 2011)

Any one who spend a decent time playing sands of time (and the warrior within) will watch it with a slime on their faces. Just to be on the safe side, I'm very harsh on adaptations(ie Eragorn: very bad plot no consistency at all) and films with simple childish dialogs and characters(ie Spiderman 3). So I am reviewing this movie with this thought in mind and asking myself is this a good adaptation? did the characters is compatible? did the screenplay, art, clothes matches the game?(Harry Potter 5 was a victim of this*), is the story arranged such that minimal changes has made in the film(since it is a film there will be times to fill the gaps that are not covered in the game story line, but are this new plots suit the story and the character behaviour.) From my side the movie has no major flow in adaptation. Everything is a possible scenario, and more the more imported thing is that the wasn't a single time where a scene conflict with the game mechanics or concepts. All was in order. Your expectation of this film will not fail you.As I was hoping some good action and effects that will capture your heart and the drama that resides in the game. (Game has a beautiful ending with a beautiful song) All was there and some more. The filler parts was more of a comedy action type and it was good too.(Remind me of the film The Mummy and the dialog :His neck did not break).Well you will find some parts that yours imagination and film wont match but as long as it is a possibility you find yourself saying ,ok this could happen too. Then you will no longer wondering or thinking about it but enjoying the show. This was the crucial part that allow myself to enjoy the film to the fullest. Since it is not easy to find a good conversion which won't make you angry or disappointed, I will just say have a good watching.
*Very bad screenplay. All early sequels are done by the same person (Steve Kloves)even though the directors changed.