If it weren't for the photography, I'd rate it 0.

Rating: 2/10 (10 January 2016)

In 1992 (or there about) there was a fairly decent move called Point Break. This version is loosely based on the earlier one. But the basis is only that the characters have the same names. Point Break is an action film best suited for testosterone-charged teen boys. The plot goes nowhere. The acting is weak (at best). The film's attempt to attach a philosophy to the extreme sports is juvenile at best. Point Break is too loud. There were too many tattoos. The FBI does not really run independent international operations. On the positive side (yes there is one--barely), the 3D photography is spectacular. The extreme sports scenes are impressive. If it weren't for the photography, I'd rate this film 0. The last 3D film I saw was Friday the 13th, Part 3. It's plot was no worse than that of Point Break. The real star of the film is the 3D photography. It is a shame that a better plot could not have been found. Lacking that, making an extreme sports documentary of the sports scenes would have resulted in a much more enjoyable film.