Too complicated philosophy with amazing nature

Rating: 6/10 (13 March 2016)

First of all I would like to mention, that I didn't watch the 1991- version and I'll judge this movie without binding to the previous version. After watching trailer I was waiting for a movie with a lot of sport tricks, plenty of dynamic scenes and a posse that robs not for self enrichment, but for supporting impoverished people. In fact I got two first points but not the last one. In the very beginning they really threw thousands of diamonds from skyscraper to Mumbai forks; they threw several million dollars from the airplane to rainforest's Bedouins. They broke the law, but there was some purpose. And it seems to be good. Every crime was connected with one of 8 tricks. So the beginning was very logical: one trick - one "good" crime for poor people. Some kind of sportive Robin Goods. But than something went wrong: sometimes they did only tricks and it seems illogical. Sometimes they did tricks with one "good" crime, but other people were injured. So it seems either it is such a concept, that they went too far in their philosophy, either the producer had only two ideas how to help people. But the crimes are too different in their nature to be a part of some common action. Nevertheless I loved the power of nature in the film. Huge waves, amazing rocks, rain forests and tricks were exceedingly surreal. So all stars I've given to this movie are for nature, tricks and maybe for some philosophy part, that is understandable for me. But as I think this is not a movie I'll watch again.