Seriously, WHO is rating this 8 out of 10? Studio plants?

Rating: 1/10 (7 August 2008)

There is no way this movie is better than 5 out of 10. It's not 1 out of ten but it's definitely not better than average and CERTAINLY not higher than 8. It's a stoner movie no better than any other stoner movie. Seth Rogen is not a very good actor and he and the other guy (who plays his friend) both get very annoying very fast with their stupid pothead act. The movie is way too long (or I guess, so boring and predictable that it SEEMS way too long) and the ending is stupid. Also how does Seth Rogen get a hot girl? Oh wait he wrote the movie so of course he ends up with a hot girl. The only people in the half-empty theatre I saw it in who were laughing (and they were laughing their asses off, even when there weren't any jokes) were three pothead idiots who were obviously baked out of their minds. They probably would have laughed if they were across the hall watching The Dark Knight. Actually they probably thought they were watching the Dark Knight. Anyway this movie sucks, the Dark Knight is worth seeing for a third time instead of watching this, which I realized regretfully after fifteen minutes into this movie which I should have demanded a refund for and then paid for a Dark Knight ticket even though it was already full just to help the box office of a movie that is good and NOT help the box office of a horrible movie for stoners. 3 out of 10 but I'm giving it a 1 to help make up for all the potheads out there who are obviously giving it all these 10s that it doesn't deserve.