I wish I was shot while watching this film...

Rating: Null/10 (17 December 2001)

40 mins of action does is not worth $10 of my money...
You know how badly this film was contribed when you're seeing a rehash of Titanic, the only difference is that Titanic was an actually enjoyable movie..
Randall Wallace is known as an accomplished writer and we all know he was responsible for writing Braveheart, based on true history to an extent, the sequence of events were mixed around for a love story but again there was flaws in the actual events that did take place.. However as inconsistant as they were it was used for a little bit of the time not 90% of the entire film that got very old very very fast...
The original script was changed alot for this movie, the question was why?? What was so different from what we were intended to see, to what we were forced to see? Was it not marketable enough? Was it actually quality writing? What made this different...??
Pearl Harbor failed on the same level as Armageddon. The filmmakers actually thought that a small amount of action wasn't as important as a hokey love story, just a b**tardization of their own history..
Buena Vista must think that their marketing schemes work as well.. Am I the only one that isnt dumb enough to believe that the film doesnt rely on actual events in history just something that never happened... They should have made the trailers for both the film release and home video release to actually show what the film was all about, wait a minute that's not common sense, thats marketing.. I've seen all the trailers and not anywhere in it there's a hint of the story line and the 3 way love triangle just the action sequences... If they're wanting to sell a movie about the events of December 1941, promote Tora Tora Tora, not Pearl Harbor... Dont just make this as something it's not..