Flawed chick flick in space

Rating: 3/10 (3 January 2017)

Saw the trailer and assumed this would be science fiction. Don't make the same mistake - this is 'stalker' territory masquerading as romance.
The visuals are stunning, and set designers would score a 10, as would the effects department.
The film's full of plot holes, but let's start with the distasteful aspect first. Jim Preston's suspended animation pod malfunctions and wakes him up 90 years early. In a ship of several thousand sleepers and a few hundred crew, he's left to walk the ship alone for over a year.
During this time he hatches the plot of waking up a fellow passenger, who he's picked. He reads up on her, essentially profiling her.
Despite (or in spite of) knowing it will ruin her life, and condemn her to the same miserable existence, he goes ahead and wakes her up.
As many others have said, this could have worked as a much darker film, where she gets revenge etc. What we get is a sappy romance story where she hates him after finding out the truth, then decides she loves him and sacrifices her future to be with him.
The film left a nasty after taste for me, as it was essentially a stalker type film, where the victim forms an emotional attachment with her 'captor' - 'Stockholm Syndrome'.
This is evidenced when she could have gone back into suspended animation, but chose to stay with the man who trashed her dreams.
Again, this could have worked if it had been far darker, exploring the human psyche. What we get is sugary coated romance.
Anyway, some obvious plot holes.
1) The ship's built on the premise that nothing will ever go wrong. This despite the film showing spare parts for every aspect of the ship later. Yet there's no facility to awaken the crew, or even having an android repair crew (despite there being service androids in abundance elsewhere).
2) It's impossible (apparentally) to go back into suspended animation once you're awake. Yet much later in the film, it shows it's possible to be put into suspended animation in the medical department. Why do the pods not have the same facility ?
3) Why was the bartender shown as human like, yet the waiters and breakfast dispensers are just machines ?
4) How did he survive a massive venting at the end ? Okay he technically died in space, but was bought back with some very dodgy procedures.
5) What would planting trees and vegetation do to delicate electronics ? Looks like a jungle at the end of the film.
Overall a massive letdown, with the message seeming to be if you're 'hot' you can get away with anything.