Just when you thought 2016 couldn't get any worse...

Rating: 4/10 (29 December 2016)

No movie is perfect, hell CinemaSins makes a living pointing out the flaws, but if they cover this, the video is going to be longer than the film.
This film is about a stalker. Jim Preston stalked Aurora Lane for months before abducting and imprisoning her alone with him with no hope of rescue. Accept it, that's what this is all about.
OK, that's the most unsavoury aspect of the film out the way, let's deal with the rest of the insanity.
First, the ship has 250 odd crew members, why aren't they on a duty rota of some sort - say ten crew members awake for a year at a time or something? Yes, I know it's not possible to put people back into hibernation on board, but that's just the first idiotic plot device that the scriptwriter lumbered this film with.
Next, the spaceship is constantly rotating, yet a tiny meteorite (judging by the size of the hole it made) managed to miss the outer sections of the ship, punch through numerous internal metal walls (!), and smash into the one bit of equipment that guarantees the protracted destruction of the ship. There are repair droids all over the place, why couldn't one of them have fixed the damage? Why isn't there a backup system? Why?
Next, a third person wakes up. How lucky is it that out of over five thousand people on board, he just happens to be someone with high level crew access codes?
I'm going to pass on the bits where gravity fails and affects the swimming pool, and where the ship passes within a few hundred kilometres of a star, but there's still idiocy aplenty, like...
Venting the nuclear reactor; what the hell is that spacesuit made from, and why can it get just a tiny hole after what it's subjected to? The rescue following that makes the Iron Man scene from The Martian seem almost plausible.
Lastly, the guy's an engineer, and everything on board has spares, so why can't he build another autodoc to act as a hibernation capsule? Yes, it might have taken them years, but everything seems to be made just to clip into place, so it couldn't be that hard surely?
I gave this four stars after coming out of the cinema because, despite its numerous flaws, it's got some nice visuals, and because Michael Sheen's performance is pretty good. I won't, however, be watching it again.