In space, your rope is never long enough.

Rating: 3/10 (26 September 2017)

*A one big spoiler, although it is not easy to spoil something like this film. The work is already done. If you are older than 7 and/or your IQ>70, do not watch or you'll suffer greatly. There is no S in that movie, just F. Unless S stands for "stupid", not "science" anymore, which is quite possible, seeing the last 10 years in SF genre. I rated it "3", it is a real rating, not a lowered one to bring a balance.
A spaceship is sent for a 120-years long journey, with no human supervision. There are backup systems for everything, but cannot be used: no awake humans on board to make repairs. There is a 300-persons crew, but hibernated, doing nothing during all the flight (what are they for?). The empty ship is well lit, all the monitors are on, the temperature and atmosphere are controlled. Just in case, somebody can always drop in. A meteor hit causes a very strange malfunction which makes a man wake up (we can compare it to the Titanic hitting an iceberg which causes turning on one of passengers' radio. Possible, but surprising).
It turns out a "Help" function in a spaceship's OS is designed by a MicroSoft employee, so the passenger learns nothing useful. He tries to contact the tech support, but that, in turn, is as easy as contact with Adobe's tech support. He travels in economy class, so he gets only a junk food (millions watts of energy can be thrown into the mud every second - heating, light, computers etc., the space journey itself must cost millions for one person, but a decent coffee (worth a quarter) can not be spent). When you travel one way 100 years to build a colony, the money from the home land has absolutely no sense, only a real value counts (imagine Robinson Crusoe on his island with a box of dollars). But Jim is charged for a call to Earth (with payment in several centuries).
When our anti-hero starts to be bored, he decides to take somebody down with him. Because why not? Does he wake up somebody who can help him? No. He chooses carefully somebody he can... well, you know what. A blonde chick. She must be stupid enough to believe him, so he goes for a journalist. Bingo. The girl wants to go and see the first year of colonization and than go back to Earth. How? She forgot it was not possible to get hibernated again, so her return was not possible. Nobody told her? Moreover, how did she intend to go back? On foot? I don't think they were going to let her take the gigantic colonization spaceship back to Earth, they probably were going to use it to build a colony. So, our cruel, selfish hero sees he has chosen right. They plant a tree in hall. Why? How? The seed? The dirt? Watering? Fertilization?
Then, the malfunction grows. Some pots fall down from the ceiling. Another man awakes, pure coincidence that he is a member of ship's crew. So he tells how to repair the ship and dies. He knows he cannot live, nor wake up another crewman who can repair the ship, because it would break a harmony of our love-birds (or rather a horny deviant and his brainless victim). A gravity fails. Newton's laws fail (e.g. swimming in a water bubble, a sudden stop of spaceship's spinning after power failure). Everything fails. But they survive passing very close to the star (the ship at 1/2 c would crash, hitting the particles emitted from the star, and/or the star's gravity would tear it to pieces), survive staring into opened reactor, etc.
And of course, there has to be a most funny moment with a rope. In space, your rope is never long enough. If you don't know the distance, cut a piece of rope and measure it. If it is 321 yards long, the distance is about 323, for sure. In every SF film lately there is a scene with too short a rope (From "Gravity" to "The Martian"). People! If you ever go to space, prepare a rope that is 3 yards longer than you think it will be needed!
Bad acting (J. Lawrence was especially wooden, but both lead characters lacked any depth). Stupid screenplay. No scientific consultation. The SF movies can totally omit science and logic if they don't pretend to be serious, e.g. Star Wars. But if the movie tries to be deep, serious, SCIENCE-fiction, the screenplay shouldn't contain gigantic errors and gaps, too big for a 10-years schoolboy. Now I am waiting for a sequel: a girl gets old, so Jim - our hero - throws her to the reactor and wakes up a second girl. Why not? Or five of them.