(Serious spoiler, suggested to read the article after viewing the film)

Rating: 6/10 (18 March 2020)

(Serious spoiler, suggested to read the article after viewing the film)
First of all, a statement of position, I was Quentin was originally a fan, then ordinary fans, now become passers-by. QT has gone downhill since the last long film, the Eight Evil One, which lasted 182 minutes, is far less narrative and Quentin-style than it was before.
The Hollywood Past is no exception. The film lasts 162 minutes, and the narrative is even worse than the previous Eight Evil One.
To begin with, the first time you know QT want to film the story starts with the news: QT want to remake the story of Sharon Tate and Roman Polanski, fans should know the story better. My initial expectation of QT the new film was that the story would be adapted into a QT-style action film and could then contain elements of suspense and B film, which should be enough for a fan.
But the whole movie is so weird that many characters don't know what it means to be there.
First of all Sharon Tate this is supposed to be the most important role. When she went to the cinema to see her own film, she put her foot up on the front chair and QT shot her foot all the time, making me think that the meaning of Sharon Tate was to satisfy QT fetish about Margot Robbie.
And then there's the well-deserved Charles Manson of the character, which, by reason, is the main character. The result is not, the most surprising is that the Manson is played by Damon Herriman, unknown, and manson this role in the play only once, about two minutes of the play, people can not understand.
Then the Rick Dalton and Cliff Booth, roles of Leonardo and Brad Pitt were even more surprising, first showing that both characters were fictional character, meant to be non-existent, and then the whole film, two hours and 42 minutes, two hours of the story of the two men, verbose and confusing, especially Cliff bragging about Pierce's nest, I really do n' t know what Quentin's doing.
Then there is the discussion of the Bruce Lee plot, first QT exaggerating the Bruce Lee accent, and the real Bruce Lee muscle content does not know how much more than the play, and then by Cliff this fictional character to degrade Bruce Lee, is also confusing.
The next step is what you call "30 minutes worth the fare back." First I say, these 30 minutes are not worth the fare back. If you've seen QT past movies, you do n' t think the 30 minutes are much better. Although the 30 minutes are really good compared to the work of the ordinary director, they can only be ordinary to QT, even his work