A sleeping pill: Biggest disappointment in film history

Rating: 4/10 (20 August 2019)

Don't fall for 10/10 rates and reviews telling the movie is Tarantino's best. It is far from it.
Let's start with the movie plot: oh hold! There's no plot in the movie to comment on. I don't mean no plot as in 'pulp fiction' like non linear, messy yet profound kind of plot, driven by deep and stunningly original characters whose decisions and development culminates in a thrilling climax. There is absolutely no plot at all.
None of the characters ( Rick Dalton, Cliff Booth, Sharon Tate) develop an inch_ except for the one time where Rick's character takes a sudden leap with just a NARRATION, embarrassingly so.
The movie just pointlessly meanders between scenes that neither develop the story /characters, nor have anything to do with one another.
The only one or two bloody and gruesome scenes in the Act 3 build up neither from any back story nor from character's purpose, thus nullifying the thrill anyway.
The actors, however, have performed extremely well. Leonardo DiCaprio should win an 'Academy'. Margaret Qualley who played ' Pussycat' should win an 'Academy' for the supporting role. Brad pitt was decent and Maggot Robbie has nicely embodied Sharon Tate.
Also, the cinematography, the musical background and the showcasing of 1969 Hollywood classy and the work of a genius
It's an alright movie for people who share Tarantino's nostalgia of the 1969 Hollywood, but for the rest it's a sleeping pill. Take a deep nap in the theatres goodluck.