Crap

Rating: 3/10 (2 October 2013)

First things first... 3 points because of main actor :) Co z his Name is Costner. Another gimmick: upper- London accent of his female companion on that mission. And there it stops for me. The rest is crappy bull-sh... from start to end- And I am a huge fan of sci- fie- genre. Non of those p pl making this flick seemed to have any steady connection to reality. They take great effort to deny logic in every single choice. A few examples: the Moon got a B.I. G. crate... estimated 25 % shot away. That is a giant use of energy to achieve what?: Film: Instant Tsunamis, Hurricanes and so on... ridiculous. A simple H- bomb placed west of Norway or southeast Portugal or one/ two other marks of defection had the same effect- with a million time less effort or energy- waste. Energy-waste is the big thing in this Film: Remember- this is a Mission to gather remaining resources... and there are sky-floating Bauhaus- homes as center of command with a huge outdoor- swimming-pool (makes a lot of sense in an altitude of some few thousand meters );a kind of helicopter with turbine- gear instead of rotors all glass and white and fancy but effective? Not after law of physics on earth:)) drones that defy gravity and are charged by battery- pods but have side-cannons instead of center-cannons , front-area of detecting and- measuring tools,instead of rings and so on. Costners gun I think, has been stolen from Star-wars clone- troopers and fancy-ed up with some lights on the side and a reading 'Caution'... lo l.
But the best of all: the colors of equipment: shiny silver and bright white. Situation is hostile with more or less permanent enemy- contact. Surroundings are typical earth : brown, yellow, green gray. Would you seriously choose those colors in that kind of situation? Uh m mm then there is the chain of command- or (widely) absence of that and .... well I better stop now....
This whole plot is so ooh off. Would think those 'Aliens' them self wrote that.