Predictable and inconsistent script.

Rating: 4/10 (19 May 2013)

If you love sci-fi, if you watch movies and read sci-fi literature, then if you watched the trailer, after a few minutes into the movie you'll have enough information to predict the whole plot.
Almost no surprises at all except for the final explication on "Tet" and the bodies switch.
Just a few sci-fi clichés pulled together in an empty and heartless package.
I would say predictable and with some script choices quite inconsistent; the main one being the battle scene which is the "bridge" to the final:
The first time a single drone approaches the "scavengers" base they have look-out posts which set an alarm; this allows them to ambush the drone and destroy it with minor losses. But when THREE drones reach the base (at the same door and possibly following the same route of the first one) no alarm goes off and the scavengers are ambushed by the drones just when they are opening the main door of their base; so the drones can literally be the "deus ex machina" to evolve the plot in a more tragic way: the chief of the scavengers is fatally injured and the "trojan drone" (that is so "Indipendence Day") is destroyed, so our hero will have to sacrifice himself for the good of humanity.
And how come Jack can build his little personal Eden without Vica even suspecting it if she can trace him at anytime and use his on board cameras to watch what he's doing?
I already wrote it: inconsistent and predictable.