Best picture?

Rating: 2/10 (27 May 2009)

If this was the only picture of the year, I would not have given it the Oscar. I only gave it a 2 because of the job Javier Bardem did in the supporting role. He probably did deserve an Oscar for that performance.
Plot? Well, a man finds two million dollars, could have probably gotten away with it but stupidly goes back to the scene of the massacre (at night) so that he could be identified. Kind of reminds you of the slasher films where someone always runs out into the woods at night when a serial killer is loose.
After two hours of everyone getting killed, the sheriff retires and the film just ends. Reminds me of the films of the 70's that just ended and you sat there wondering what happened. Did they run out of film? I am beginning to wonder about the sanity of the Acadamy when the award Best Picture. In the last few years, they have been some of the worst movies I have viewed.
I think we should only be watching movies with an IMDb rating of 6.5 or below. When I was in college, I did not get the Andy Warhol films, so maybe I am missing something here too. Can someone explain what made this a great film?