Spielberg has made a mess by trying to criticize US indirectly

Rating: 4/10 (29 January 2006)

It's a shame this pro terrorist film uses the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians to actually criticize THE US and Bush without doing so directly, because Spielberg is too scared to lose over 50% of his US paying customers he sacrifices Israel instead, blurring the lines between terror and anti terror. He wants to say to president Bush what he really thinks of his policies and actions after 9/11.
Why do I say this? In the book "vengeance" Avner comes back to Israel and goes back to being an officer in the army ( his pre mossad job ) and in Spielberg's film Avner stays in NY city, and the twin towers are seen in the background as if to confirm and make all the movies statements on violence true.
In the book "vengeance" the idea of anti terror is explained: to buy time, when a well established terrorist ring is whipped out it takes years to reorganize and lives of civilians are saved.
Another thing that didn't ring true is making "black September" terrorist "freedom fighters" they never represented Palestinians and should not be confused as fighting for the Palestinian people, black September kidnapped the athletes in order to get 200 More terrorists out of Israeli prisons.
Spielberg has made a mess by trying to criticize US indirectly; as a result he offends many sides