Over-rated under developed.

Rating: 1/10 (9 February 2016)

I doubt I can express my dislike for the movie in only 1,000 words. It is a meaningless jumble of wasted time. It is a meandering Alzheimer patient telling a story with no start, end or meaning, and just like one, I wanted to escape from it.
A piece of art without an author attempting to deliver a message stops being art and is just a thing. It's not that I don't "get" the message, because no one "gets" the message, there's not one to get. It's a meaningless journey with characters that have no appeal, are told to not act, have no emotion or personal connection, acting like pod people. The shots always look terrible, in that the camera is put some where dumb, in order to trick the viewer into thinking the movie is trying to tell you something, when instead, it's just put some where dumb, with symbolism that leads no where and is meaningless or obscure to pointlessness. Mulholland Drive is the cinematic equal to an inkblot test. An meaningless collection of shots that have no connection except what the viewer chooses to impose. But one does not need to sit for 2 hours of terrible acting and a non-story and utter molasses of a pacing to have a thought they want to have. They can just have that thought, so the movie adds no cultural depth, unlike a movie with a message.
Many will say you need to figure out what's a dream, and what's real. But any scenes combined in any order is equally dull, uninteresting, and stupid all at once. It could all be real or all be a dream and it'd be an equally bad movie experience devoid of message or thought beyond what the user interposes to it, save for a 15 minute bit near the end which at least tracks, and has a story of some kind with characters that do anything, rather than wander around pointlessly, then just stop being in the movie without resolution or point to their story.