Movie of the Year? I think Not.

Rating: 1/10 (25 April 2002)

For the life of me, I can't see how this film EVER was suggested as a candidate for "Movie of the Year". Watching it felt like watching 18 stories that were loosely connected, but not so much that some of them could be dropped without losing anything. The director seemed to selectively choose which stories to bring closure to, and which to leave dangling. By the end, I felt like the 2+ hours I'd spent watching the movie had been wasted. Furthermore, there was little or no music to add to the film ... a major oversight in my opinion.
If you're into pointless story-lines, non-existent audio, and unresolved plots ... maybe you'll like this film ... but I found it to be a complete waste of time and emphatically recommend you look elsewhere for something worth watching.