Like spilling paint on the floor and hoping it turns into a painting.

Rating: 3/10 (21 August 2002)

It could be interpreted any number of different ways. But, what is clear, the story is jumbled, characters change name, situations are repeated with different people. Two stories mixed together? Two variations on the same story? Who cares? For me it was a pointless.
I've noticed a number of the reviews of people that liked it seem to suggest that the movie needs to be studied and reviewed so that you can really "get it". That there really is a masterpiece in there somewhere. I would suggest to them, that if you spill paint on the floor and stare at it long enough, you may actually see a face after a while, but you are still looking at a mess, not a painting.
On the upside, Naomi Watts was great. Her performance was believable despite whatever character she was playing or situation she was in.