I Like to think i think i understood well

Rating: 1/10 (20 December 2016)

i would say the flick is monstrous, why?, well, it offers an holistic world view where the naturalistic way of though is the main one, thus leaving the burden to chance to be the explanation of the origin of life, then again this is not the main point of the movie, but it moves forward with that statement as ground conception of the fantastic possibilities inherent in the phenomenon we relate as consciousness, and so on... its a good production, and i am not trying to hurt the movie with the critic, i am just saying that reality seems to me to be far more complex, but then again there are ways to explain it in a simple manner; the complexity of it, you don't go just lay it all out and call it art, yo create art by connecting with reality, onto-logically speaking, but using the film as a way of expressing it, the image, it should make me feel other emotions than the burden of another fiction.
By the way, i am not against the naturalistic way, neither the creation, nor other possibilities, if you follow the syntactic line of theories, humankind has develop a serious place for the mystic, understanding it as a science yet to be known: the metaphysical realm, and there is much to be accomplished, all though reason has limits, the dead mans toil has shared the legacy time and again.