Just because its loaded with hundreds of metaphors and it takes a while to crack and make any sense of doesnt make the movie good, right?

Rating: 6/10 (3 January 2018)

Seems to me Aronofsky's style is more about covering up a simple point so deep that when you finally find it it feels like an achievement in itself and you can say "OMG I AM ZO CHMART". He's basically making you work up your own egotrip by solving his puzzle and a good feeling that you actually understood what all this mess you just watched means so you dont feel like a total dumbass. If a 5 year old told you the very same story/conclusion you would tell him that its common knowledge and that everyone knows this. But cover it up under a ton of metaphors bombarding you every minute oooooh its freakin genious.
Why would mother earth be gods inspiration? why would she be his wife? shes is just another one of his creations. why would mother earth want to be alone with god and not have people around that he just created when aronofsky says that she "gives us life on this planet" yet she hates them as soon as they come and wants to be alone with him and keeps hating them from start to finish.
The idea itself is kinda interesting, you could even fit in the theory of the destruction and reconstruction of the universe (lord shiva? hinduism?) compared to the cycles of "mothers"...but this is the problem....it seems its all just a bunch of "trowing sh't at the wall and hoping something sticks" type of allegories....in the end the movie is just made so clunky and overwhelming that it doesnt convey any message in a very good way.
Props to aronofski for something original and that sparked alot of discussions but boy... metaphors are really overrated theyse days huh?