lackluster

Rating: 6/10 (26 January 2004)

this movie was decent. please do not go ahead in saying that it's 'the best movie of the year' because it's not. charlize theron is winning accolades only because this role is suprising to critics and the audience compared to her generic roles. if julianne moore or another equally talented actress took charlize's role it wouldn't make the splash it did. charlize theron picked this role to suprise her audience and get an oscar. i will admit in saying that her acting has improved, but compared to the likes of other actresses she's still a b-list star and always will be.

this movie is lackluster.