Better than II, but still nowhere as good as I

Rating: 4/10 (23 December 2006)

First, I loved MI I, it is one of the best spy flicks I had seen, it was fun, smart, and kept you guessing all the way to the end. II was a dog, a huge WOOF of a film that had no story, just two hours of special effects. When I sat down to watch the third, I was not expecting much, and that is what I got. Better than #2, it does have a decent story, but the writing is so bad and the directing makes the film confusing at times. I though Ving Rhymes was a computer expert? Now he is a regular field agent. Also, frankly, I don't want a love story, just a great spy flick. It was not a waste of time to watch it, but I won't be watching it again anytime soon.