Sad that more people didn't understand.

Rating: 9/10 (18 June 2001)

Yes, this movie requires more than one viewing to truly understand everything. WHY IS THIS A BAD THING? I am tired of action movies underestimating my intelligence. Why, once we get a movie that requires us to think, do we bitch about it? I'm sure comments relaying that most people found it too "confusing" reached the appropriate people, which would adequately explain the sub-par sequel. I sincerely hope they return to the smart espionage style the first Mission:Impossible represented for the third installment.