Must be very lazy to watch yet another

Rating: 5/10 (7 February 2016)

Good action, easy to watch without paying too much attention, but is this all we can get - sequels to movies? No new ideas.
Speaking of bad ideas, I was trying to think back to when that bald-win guy was a good actor and I come up blank. He is so very poor in that role, unconvincing, absent of genuine emotion, what a great agent he must have.
And the lead, always ready, lets nothing stop him, and the best he can do when trapped in the listening room at the beginning is to bang against the door and grimace, harshly? If you are a long flight and the movie is free, go ahead.
Not enough lines? As if everyone reads the entire review. Is there science behind the number of lines required for a review? Not very green you you IMDb, makes me spend more time logged on, make you allocate more storage to the review