Good film, huge plot holes.

Rating: 7/10 (28 December 2002)

There was no evidence to lead him to his son's 'killer' to murder him in the first place, so that section was a huge paradox.
Also, at the end when Burgess and Anderton face off, they have no idea that the precogs had seen a murder, they had not been in contact with anyone at the temple. So Cruise talked him out of killing him without any knowledge of the future, so the precogs would never have predicted it.
Maybe these things were explained in the book, I haven't read it so i don't know, but they were glaring holes in the film.