Watched it too many times, here to debunk the Leo Crow plot hole

Rating: 10/10 (11 January 2014)

I have watched Minority Report 8 times in my life. I can assure you 99.9% of the people ended up not completely understanding the plot and purpose of the movie. So, you should watch it endless times like I do.
Kidding.
Leo Crow murder is indeed a plot hole, it is by no means a terribly unexplained plot.
Here you go. The producer posits a universe without free will, where our actions are predetermined. No one talks about changing the course of the future or finding ways to collapse the wave function. There is no wave function: time is a straight line, one path, and the precogs can see straight down that path. There is no opportunity for Anderton to be truly free of the precrime in the movie's Universe.
And because there are too many ways to set a person up for felony, it has become an implausible plot. What Lamar did was just to set someone up to lay a bunch of photos of his son somewhere and to be present at the apartment at Lamar's narrated time, precogs would then link the gait to Anderson's future murder? This seems way too implausible because Leo Crow is a total stranger to Anderton. Well, in the movie, he broke it by using his sheer self-control and proved murderers can change the fate of a precrime if they know it earlier. This part has no implication of Agatha's minority report because Agatha did not produce a disparity in vision with the other precogs, only to show the system can be manipulated at will, but Spielberg made it not the right way. That's why it is a plot hole.
What Spielberg should have laid the scene is one that sees Lamar implanting a pair of counterfeit red balls named Leo Crow and Anderson. That's it! Everything after that is all yours.