What an Oofie sequel

Rating: 4/10 (9 June 2019)

MiB 2 isn't as bad as other people say but it's not that good either.
CHARACTERS
I actually think that J is a better character in this movie than in the last movie.
For the first they developed him so that he is a professional good agent in MiB 2 and they also made him more humane by making him not whipe the memory of Laura giving him a little development.
K isn't as good though.
They could have focused on developed the plot about K getting his memory whiped but they just made that a conflict and it got easily resolved.
VILLAIN
The villain is pretty boring.
She has a basic motivation similar motivation for the Villain in MiB 2 but the difference is that the one in the first movie was actually funny but she is just pretty bland.
COMEDY
The comedy was lacklustre in this one.
A few repeated jokes a few new unfunny ones it didn't make me laugh that much.
VERDICT
I kinda get why people don't like this movie.
It's similar to the first one and it has some holes in logic for example.
1. People saw an alien in the first scene of the movie but they didn't memory whipped and even if they did it would be impossible for all of them to be memory whipped (they solved it later but even that's stupid).
2. Why didn't the citizen react scared to what was just happening.
3. They whipped agent T's memory but isn't that suit exclusive to MiB
4. How did James know how many people were in the subway is he some super genius cause he has done some stupid stuff.
5. The flushing system is stupid and it will make people pay attention and sceptical of what's actually going on.
6. K got his memory back but he needed to know how to fight of the aliens even if he worked on MiB longer than J.
7. They didn't care to solve the problem with big worm staying on the subway they just let him kill civilians.
8. If they whipe the whole cities memory won't memory whipe some people from the MiB.
That's actually alot of holes in logic, you know what? MiB is pretty bad so I'll give it a 4/10.