Does not *belong* in Top 10? Then why is it *in* it...

Rating: 10/10 (28 December 2001)

The last time I read the comments on this film, it was filled with mostly praise and a few bad reviews here and there. That's cool, 'cos everyone's entitled to their opinion on the quality of the film. That's what a review on a film should be, simply to say whether a film is good or bad.
What's putting me off is the fact that people are bagging this film because of the fact that it's in the Top 10!!
They go "Oh, it's a good film... but it shouldn't be in the Top 10, no way". Excuse me, but the Top 250 here in IMdB is for the *public*, and it is compiled by ratings given by all IMdB users. No one fixes it. What's the point of saying it does not belong in the Top 10, when it clearly does, simply because it already is?
Please, quit bagging this film because it's in the Top 10.