The Meditation of Memento [possible spoilers]

Rating: Null/10 (4 June 2001)

Let me begin by stating that this movie is brilliant, incredible, beautiful in its intrinsic nature, etc. etc. etc. However, I have not seen the movie in a month or so and, hence, will try not to let these feelings play a bias role in what I'm about to say.
I want to respond to a few comments that have been made thus far regarding certain so-called "disappointing" aspects of the film. Perhaps doing so will help others who have already experienced this film, but above all, I want to stress one thing: Those who believe Memento looks interesting should go ahead and take the challenge, but of these people who see the film, every single one should see it again, and at the very least, contemplate for awhile. Okay, on to it. . .
First. Some have described the use of backward storytelling as a gimmick. However [and I am not the first to say this either], could this film have been created in any other way? Could we revel in our bewilderment as the last scene ends in black and the credits roll had the story been told in the same old "normal" way? I think not. As many have already discussed, we are stepping into the soles of Leonard's shoes. In order to fully appreciate his situation, we must be just as baffled as he is. And can we not simply appreciate Nolan's ability to fashion such a tale? As for this so-called gimmick" causing viewers to question the plausibility of the story, consider the fact that Nolan creates an environment in which our own minds fail us. As the film progresses, we begin to lose track of what has been happening thus far--yes, the plot becomes fuzzy and even perforated, but all to contribute to our identification with Leonard.
Second. I read a few comments criticizing character depth, i.e. not being able to care enough. Perhaps Leonard's character appears shallow [for lack of a better word], but he has no short term memory. He feels as though he is only "half a man at best". His life is a mere 5 minutes in length at all times. Not to mention that his long term memories only serve to remind him of his once happier and now long lost life. All of this would contribute to just about anyone's sense of shallowness--in the literal sense, of course. Teddy's character, on the other hand, absolutely exudes depth in the sense that we are forced into a constant state of speculation: did he kill Leonard's wife, or is he trying to help Leonard, does he truly care, or is he actually using Leonard, if so, why? At times I was right along with Leonard when he would take out the "don't trust him" photograph. However, I also found myself sympathizing with Teddy--his giant smile so inviting, yet so repulsive and sinister at the same time. [Bravo Joe Pantoliano!]
And finally. Many have described this film as disappointing, riddled with plot holes, implausible, or simply unimpressive. I, as others do, feel as though these people have not experienced the big picture [no pun intended]. This movie actually requires subsequent viewings, or at the very least, a structured explanation from someone who has partook in this ritual. I will admit whole-heartedly that when the credits began to roll, I was dumbfounded--I did not necessarily feel cheated, but the answers I wanted were not readily available as they are in most films. This is a situation with which many have a problem. The "I want answers, and I want them now" is indeed indicative of our rushed society of today. Perhaps we need to look at film the way we do art. It isn't all completely accessible right away. Upon discussion over coffee with someone on her second viewing, many of my questions were, in fact, answered. We need time to ponder, and this may take hours, days, or even months. Entertainment is not always instantaneous. In my opinion, as a criterion, entertainment should in fact endure for as long as it possibly can.
Someone recommended reading Kant rather than seeing this film, and while I do not necessarily agree with this line of suggestion, I do agree that both Kant and Memento are good examples of true entertainment--both contain qualities that allow for extended contemplation and, hence, dazzle the mind as good entertainment should.