I'll join the chorus of one star reviews accusing this spin off of "crimes and misdemeanors" of boring triteness

Rating: 1/10 (16 August 2010)

woody allen is so pathetic. once again we have two characters who are "deeper" than the people around them... in a "married the boss' daughter" fantasy. OK this time they don't turn out to be absolute heroes but it's so embarrassing, woody allen's idea of "class" and "not trivial" (he spoke of doestoevsky - which led me to expect a confession from chris. well, woody allen is no doestoevsky . . . ) why all the 78 recordings of opera playing throughout? really long and dreary and... this is the movie that, if I remember correctly, was well received? this is the one that I seemed to remember was well thought of enough that I decided to give him another chance after the last film of his I watched, "small time crooks" which was, well, even more revolting than this I suppose and made lousy use of tracy ullman, which has got to be pretty difficult to do...
when it really started getting incredibly stupid for me was when they ran off into the rainstorm and did it getting soaking wet. how are they supposed to have managed to get away with that when the brother in law was looking for scarlett... (for once usually it's chloe who's running around calling out "chris? chris?) anwyay, it definitely really sucked another woody allen high class wet dream. dull...