Why wouldn't we speak

Rating: 1/10 (5 January 2020)

The movie looks good from the perspective of "drama", until you look through the scenario and the decisions the main characters made during the whole movie.
1. We (the audience) haven't seen that Nicole actually discussed what makes her unhappy with her husband (Chris) or anyhow tried to solve her own life with him, but acted only behind his back ruining the family.
2. Every lawyer wants earn big using unhappy family as their 'successful' portfolio, and no layer would advise such a Nicole to simply talk to her husband and tell him what she feels before attacking taking everything he have earned. The layer was the only one character in the movie who played on the family, basically destroying it, and of course, got a nice profit.
3. I would understand Nicole's unhappy live with her husband if he hadn't care about her, but he basically made her a Star. She reached her dream, and only then decided to divorce him when she doesn't need him anymore.
4. During the whole movie we see how Chris was pushed. Is he such a bad man? He cheated, but this wasn't the main point the movie was trying to emphasize. Should we (the women) now divorce every time the men don't listen to us, to what we want without any explanation?
5. I have been waiting for a moment when they finally discuss their problems together. All they shouted was not about what they DID and want to GET from each other (except Chris's cheated), but how they ARE bad for each other. The movie teaches well how to break any relationships and at the same time it says - "So we shouldn't even try to listen to each other."
The moral part of the movie stays pathetic. The family was ruined because Nicole managed to tell her problem only to the lawyer. Yes, she's got what she wanted, but was she happy after? It didn't seem so in the end.
I'm scared to see that people consider this movie as something "wonderful". It teaches us to do stupid stuff without thinking that it may hurt someone we love