hmmmmm.... not that good

Rating: 5/10 (28 June 2013)

not so long ago in 2006. Bryan Singer _, how we thought then, cemented the fate of the Superman movie franchise. Although solidly directed, it was a long and sometimes boring movie with almost no action scenes and the main advantage was visually spectacular Superman lifting mountain into space. huge budget was not justified , film failed at the box office.
but behold, the devil could not rest, apparently C. Nolan needed some money and decided to produce a new Superman adventure.
trailers have been promising, action packed with spectacular visual effects, but on big screen, it all looks a lot different. film is surprisingly dull. action scenes are endless , awkward staged (Snyder directed the whole movie with only one camera, which is unacceptable for a movie of such proportions), and when action miraculously ends , then we have endless babbling and irritating flashbacks of young Clark Kent . What I was particularly astounded by were almost unfinished CGI that does not look good and extremely fake. snyder tries to make this movie epic , but unfortunately there is no knowledge or talent. one of the few positive things: the soundtrack is not bad , solid acting and Henry Cavill is certainly the best superman since legendary Christopher Reeve.
but the 'man of steel', mainly due to aggressive marketing, sails very good at world box office , and it doesn't have to be afraid of singers shipwreck from 2006.
It took me seven years to figure out that 'Superman Returns' is actually a good movie while 'man of steel' together with 'after earth' is perhaps the worst blockbuster this year so far..