"Man Of Steel" was an absolute masterpiece.

Rating: 10/10 (14 June 2013)

***** MAY CONTAIN SPOILERS IF YOU DON'T KNOW KRYPTON'S EVENTS *****
"Man Of Steel" was an absolutely amazing movie, there's not much more I can say to convey how incredible that experience truly was. The development and the action was beyond anything I've seen. All of the actors/actresses were fantastic in this film, and they worked their hearts out. Cavill and Snyder both create a Superman that feels realistic, a man that has lost SO much. Clark Kent, who is struggling to find his place in the world that he doesn't fit in, finds out his people are wiped out, his home was destroyed, and he's essentially adopted. Now Earth, a planet that he does not originate from, is ENTIRELY on his shoulders, and he still manages to flash a smile. Between Henry Cavill, Diane Lane, Kevin Costner, Russell Crowe, and Ayelet Zurer, the emotional connection this movie brought forth was outstanding.
Now, some negative reviews are seeming to take hold on this movie, and I have some input for these people. First off, this movie is obviously well made, there is no question about it, your credibility of even making an argument against that is practically revoked by standard. However, some people believe that the development of certain aspects of the movie were lacking, and for that I wish to elaborate my opinion on. "Iron Man 3" and "The Avengers" for instance both received high reviews, but showed just as much action as "Man Of Steel" did, possibly even more. Thing is, "Man Of Steel" had way more development in every fundamental department. I absolutely LOVE the "Iron Man" movie series, along with "The Avengers." I'm a huge comic book fan, but this is absolutely absurd. "300," another movie which I love, even has a higher review, but we ALL know that the development was sub-par at best compared to this movie. Stop leaving negative reviews in spite of a movie, just because it's highly anticipated, and you wish to be edgy.