Too Much Action? No Storyline? I'm Sorry

Rating: 10/10 (14 June 2013)

*** SPOILERS ***
What the hell are critics on about here? Mid film I was thinking what the hell are people on about when it comes to 'to much action' I was craving a bit of action at one point, the Action sequences were perfect, and may have been a little dragged yes, but it's Superman! We are witnessing Zod and his army getting stronger the longer they're exposed to the Sun, thus the longer fights.
The story was great for a reboot, villain fitted in perfectly with the origin and story, and it made sense. (SPOILER) I have read complaints about no twist in the film, well there was a small twist, nothing jaw dropping but it was a good one. General Zod and co are looking to retrieve the Codex, it's not traceable, and they eventually learn it's within Kal-El's body system. I personally didn't think it would be there at the time, so that's a small potential twist you critics can look for?
I know most critics are all failed film writers so I understand their reasons to hate, seems they're also Marvel fan boys, and I'm not one to compare films with others but I have to here. I enjoyed Avengers don't get me wrong, but did it have a strong storyline? No (I'm not going into details neither) It was just a fun film.
Back to Man of Steel.
So, if you have ever watched the likes of Smallville, read the comics, it is a film you are going to love. (SPOILER) My only concern for the film was Superman snapping Zods neck at the end, because Superman doesn't kill, but I understand why it happened, it worked and I applaud Goyer and Snyder because I loved it, and not forgetting Zimmers score, which is brilliant. Looking forward to seeing again and again.
Now it's time to wait for San Diego Comic Con to hear the announcement of future of DC Comic Films.
Go and see this film, and give it the money it deserves!