"Cinema" is a medium to "state" through scenes.

Rating: 1/10 (9 February 2016)

What has happened to the "Blockbusters" of the recent decade? There is no doubt that above all other options, the audience should be entertained; but to what extent is it worth to provide absurd entertainment aimlessly and without any story? "Mad Max: Fury Road" is as frivolous as 1920's "Slapstick" comedies; except that these comedies are assessed justifiable as they have been made at the emergence of cinema. However, such idiot-ism that hitting and banging the whole 2 hours is strange in 2015. "Mad Max" is story-less and there is no plan to involve the audience in events by drama. Too amateur illustrations that are tried to seem professional and rigorous! So what is the role of mis-en-scene? On what basis has it been arranged that do not help the story promote? "Mad Max: Fury Road" does not have necessary standards for being a movie at all; and this is the outcome of "Cinephilia" attitude that grabs "Cine- academia" aspects of the movie and presents inane scenes. Scenes that stems in illiteracy of the movie maker. The movie characters are infirm and unproductive. When a newcomer who has not meet previous versions of "Mad Max" watch this one, asks who is "Max"?, Why does not he talk in order to help the back-story enhance the narration? Who is the "Bad Man" of the movie? What has changed him into such a blood-thirsty monster? What is the purpose of the story? What is the relationship between "Water poverty" and the movie narration? And more important: Has George Miller thought of anything other than burning, shooting and Rock music? "Cinema" is a medium to "state" through scenes. "Mad Max: Fury Road" may gross a lot and receive many awards, but it is a pre-movie and a disaster and if it is placed in 10-best-movies list of many critics is because of the discreet charm of "Cinephilia".