New Interpret, but poor as a film

Rating: 1/10 (26 April 2016)

I ever read Shakespere's Macbeth and seen many actress interpret and play as "Witch" with overacting style ... and this movie catch me in the eye s by the first moment that I can't distinguish between witch and commoner.
If it was a college homework, I will rate this movie as 7.5/10 to encourage my student that with the new interpret they can make new great creative story. But in this review, when every elements counted.
Characteristic: 2/10 There were only 2 diversity of character in this movie and that very shame for Shakesphere's play. (1) Gloom character (2) Gloomer character
Beat: 3/10 Unexpectedly, from Shakesphere's play which reputation from many beat in his play and entertaining style was make to only 3 beat (1) slow (2) slower (3) slowest
OK, they find new way to interpret. But it's boring. (If they are my students I would rather say "Wow, your interpret interesting and if you just make it's more brief, more attention pulling you will get the full score")